Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

I am not trying to be rude but can you tell us all exactly how accurate SolarHam.com is with their predictions about solar activity. Our local weathermen cannot forecast the weather here in the mountains accurately five days ahead of time and these folks are expecting me to believe them for the next decade?


74 posted on 06/14/2011 5:44:49 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Allowing Islam into America is akin to injecting yourself with AIDS to prove how tolerant you are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: B4Ranch; SunkenCiv
I “second” your comment. Gee, and I saw a picture of the Sun exploding not even a week ago. SunkenCiv posted it (I think), but my thinking goes into non-thinking sometimes.
77 posted on 06/14/2011 5:49:48 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
It isn't a question of believing "Solarham.com." This is research by the top solar experts.
78 posted on 06/14/2011 5:52:39 PM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
I am not trying to be rude but can you tell us all exactly how accurate SolarHam.com is with their predictions about solar activity.

SolarHam does not originate it, he provides an aggregation point from a lot of sources. The first chart was from NASA at http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/ssn_predict_l.gif and the second chart was created from data from NOAA/SWPC (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Space Weather Prediction Center) by http://www.solen.info/

102 posted on 06/15/2011 5:33:55 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
Addendum to my prior post: The graph predicting the solar cycle comes from NASA, and they've been modifying their prediction model practically every month as new data comes in. I've been saving their old graphs (some recovered from internet archives). In July 2007 they were predicting cycle 24 would peak in 2011 at around 150 (higher peak than cycle 23 at 120). In November 2009, as cycle 24 was delayed in starting, they shifted their estimate to a peak of 80 in 2013. In February 2011 they had the peak as 58. Now they have it as 70 in 2013.

My personal suspicion is that they were right the first time as to the peak occurring in 2011, but were very wrong in the predicted level. I suspect that we're at the peak, or close to it, and that this cycle will resemble the Dalton Minimum. If cycle 24 looks like it's on a down swing in late fall, stock up, because we may have a bad winter and a bad planting season in 2012.

103 posted on 06/15/2011 5:49:45 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson