That whole perjury proof really brought down Clinton administration, didn’t it?
You people that think this will amount to anything are starting to make me laugh.
Please brush up on that ancient 1990’s history on the hearings of US government officials and agencies before you start getting exited about this latest round of foolishness, please, for the sake of America.
Might I suggest they start with the WhiteWater hearings of 1995? Some of the exact same tactics successfuly used back then are being used as I'm typing this. Witnesses replying that they "...cannot answer that because it is currently under investigation." Back then it was about the Foswter suicide(?) while today it is about who knew what when.
You might want to re-read my post. At no time did I assert that applying perjury penalties would bring down this administration. Rather I simply stated that I wanted to put those under investigation under oath. The purpose of which was to create an environment that would require them to be truthful or face penalties.
In the article, you will notice that in letters to congress (not official documents or under oath) one story / spin was put forward which seems to contradict other evidence. Put them under oath and get some straight answers.
My God! Ive just now realized it ... of course, you are right. We should all sell everything, and head for Australia. These guys have all the power ... we can never recover from this.
It's hopeless ... hopeless ... hopeless!
Thank you so much for straightening me out.
Keep up the good work. There are others who haven't yet realized that ... it's too late.
I think you should just make a will..and off yourself.
Thanks for the brain fart newby. Now I’ve got to febreze everything.
So how'd all that help Clinton's planned successor, his former VP Al Gore.
Besides giving us eight years of George Bush, of course.