Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DariusBane

“The problem with you is you don’t like the second amendment.”

No, I think the second amendment is the backbone of the Constitution. I also happen to think that no, you nor anyone else should be allowed to own a carrier battle group.

Or a LAW rocket.

Or a .50 cal automatic, with or without tripod.

Or a grenade.


68 posted on 06/16/2011 7:19:34 AM PDT by Grunthor (Make the lefts' collective brain cell implode; Cain/Bolton 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Grunthor

As I said, you don’t like the 2nd amendment.

Lexington and Concord were about large bore crew served military weapons. Not sporting arms.

Don’t tell me you respect the 2nd amendment when you reject the very premise on which is was founded.

Keep arms. That means I can buy arms, and keep arms. Bear arms. That means I can have them on my person.

Let me ask you again. Should I be required to have a permit or a license of some kind to drive to the grocery store with a revolver in my belt?

Should the government be “allowed” to tell me that I cannot have a fully auto m-4 carbine in the tool box of my pickup truck? When you read the enumerated powers of the constitution where do you see the power to tell me what kind of weapon I can have or can’t have?

The feds use the commerce clause. But they use commerce clause for everything imaginable.


69 posted on 06/16/2011 7:48:06 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson