Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feinstein vs. Coburn-Feinstein on ethanol subsidy
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 6/16/11 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 06/16/2011 8:11:52 AM PDT by SmithL

On Tuesday, the Senate voted 40-59 against an amendment by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to end the annual $6 billion (45 cents-per-gallon) tax subsidy for ethanol, as well as the 54 cents-per-gallon tariff on imported ethanol.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., was a co-author of the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit Repeal Act. As she explained, the subsidy bestows $15 million a day "on large oil companies with no good reason" and drives up food prices.

Yet Tuesday Feinstein voted against her own amendment.

Feinstein explained to reporters that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid promised her a vote on a similar amendment. That vote is scheduled for today. She voted against her own measure "because of the process Coburn used." Coburn switched legislative language to win a floor vote that had been stalled. Party-line Dems who voted against the bill played enforcer.

Problem: Unlike Feinstein, six senators in the Democratic caucus voted for the amendment.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coburnfeinstein; ethanol; feinstein; subsidy

1 posted on 06/16/2011 8:11:58 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Hmm... the issue must not be that explosive if Feinstein just needs to go to the ‘oil companies bad’ mantra. The oil companies do get to pay less per gallon for ethanol purchased from, oh yeah, oil companies, but the result is to put a lot more money in farm pockets. Guess she’s trying to avoid irritating Iowa voters.


2 posted on 06/16/2011 8:16:06 AM PDT by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

We need to remove subsidies and mandates for ethanol, not simply because they are subsidies and mandates, but because they screw up the ag and added-value ag sector. It’s time to move beyond ethanol, and that will never happen if we keep the status quo in place.


3 posted on 06/16/2011 8:17:07 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What made the democrats so mad is that Coburn called for cloture, and (whine) that’s what Harry Reid usually does. He doesn’t like anybody stepping on his privileges (although any senator can call for cloture). They didn’t like the “process” that Coburn used, i.e. using the senate rules without telling anybody he was going to do it so they could undercut him. He didn’t tell McConnell either, because McConnell would, of course, tell Reid because of the collegiality of the senate where republicans always fall for the gentlemanly crap.

Good for Coburn. He smoked them out. Feinstein was a co-writer of the amendment but voted against its passage due to “process.” And according to Lindsay Grahamnesty, “the process” is so important.


4 posted on 06/16/2011 8:43:48 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson