Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects atheist's latest challenge to Pledge of Allegiance
cna ^ | June 16, 2011

Posted on 06/16/2011 12:46:14 PM PDT by NYer

The U.S. Supreme Court

Washington D.C., Jun 16, 2011 / 06:08 am (CNA).- On June 13, the Supreme Court ruled against atheist activist Michael Newdow's latest attempt to remove the words “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.

“Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court has again rejected the argument that saying the Pledge of your own free will creates an official state religion,” said attorney Eric Rassbach, litigation director at the religious liberty defense group the Becket Fund.

“The words 'one nation under God' make clear the bedrock American principle that our rights come not from the State, but are endowed by our Creator.”

On Monday, the Supreme Court rejected Newdow's appeal from the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston. Newdow had attempted to halt the ability of schoolchildren in Hanover, New Hampshire from reciting the Pledge voluntarily.

In March, the Supreme Court also rejected Newdow's appeal from a loss in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

In both cases, the non-profit Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and global Catholic fraternal organization the Knights of Columbus intervened in the lawsuits to help school children who want to recite the pledge.

The Knights of Columbus led the effort to add the phrase “under God” to the Pledge 55 years ago.

The Becket Fund said in its briefs filed in the First Circuit and the Ninth Circuit that there is a  connection between the pledge and other statements like the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address. The briefs argue that each of those documents express the basic American philosophy that civil rights are inalienable because government does not create them.

Rassbach warned, however, that Newdow's latest attempt to remove the words “under God” may not be the last challenge to the pledge.

“Dr. Newdow has said that he will continue to challenge the pledge around the country, and we will be there to defend it,” he said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: atheism; moralabsolutes; newdow; pledge; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Lurking Libertarian
There was no decision. The Court voted 9-0 not to hear the case.

They denied cert, so all we know is that there weren't four votes to hear the case.

21 posted on 06/16/2011 1:16:42 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Wow, I wish I could waste my whole life on a crusade against something.

Hopefully more meaningful though.

Wonder where he gets the money, time I think to go after the money. Hit’em where it hurts.


22 posted on 06/16/2011 1:18:18 PM PDT by thatjoeguy (Wind is just air, but pushier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Omg. some people really have to much free time.
What a waste of time and tax money.
And i´m an atheist myself ;-)


23 posted on 06/16/2011 1:20:33 PM PDT by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“State Religion” means that the ruler or elected head of a country is the head of the Church in that country, and that is the official religion of that country. They also assess taxes to pay for the official church. Almost every country in the world has a state religion, except for us. We have never had a state religion, except for awhile Maryland had a state Catholic church, but the idea of the Pilgrims was to worship the way they wanted to, but they were all Christians, so that is how we got “Under God” in our Pledge. We are still mostly Christian, even today.


24 posted on 06/16/2011 1:23:51 PM PDT by MondoQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Francis Bellemy was not a conservative.


25 posted on 06/16/2011 1:27:31 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Monarchy is the one system of government where power is exercised for the good of all - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Francis Bellemy was not a conservative.

Even a commie is right sometimes.

26 posted on 06/16/2011 1:30:03 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I am surprised that no one has yet brought a suit on the “prevent the free exercise therof” clause.


27 posted on 06/16/2011 1:30:27 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (We will fight for America and it starts here in Madison, WI. It starts here. It starts now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Newdow had attempted to halt the ability of schoolchildren in Hanover, New Hampshire from reciting the Pledge voluntarily.

How and why is this idiot not getting involved in Hanover, NH?

28 posted on 06/16/2011 1:31:02 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Newdow is such a hateful, spiteful man controlled by evil. May God in His mercy touch that man and make him realize his need to repent and be saved before it’s too late.


29 posted on 06/16/2011 1:39:16 PM PDT by OB1kNOb (Financial Repression.......it answers a lot of questions.....read about it on FinancialSense.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinOfKingston

We had a feature on cable TV where we could throw virtual tomatoes at the TV screen. We hit Obama every chance we got! LOL Great fun.


30 posted on 06/16/2011 1:42:46 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
"Personally, I would like to beat the crap out of him

As would we all! Way too much time on his hands. he should find a new hobby, like clay pottery in the arizona desert or something.

31 posted on 06/16/2011 1:48:08 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
They denied cert, so all we know is that there weren't four votes to hear the case.

There were no recorded dissents, so it's fair to assume that no Justice wanted to hear the case.

32 posted on 06/16/2011 2:21:01 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NYer

if you keep using the courts to push the same personal agenda and keep losing at some point you should be responsible for ALL court costs.


33 posted on 06/16/2011 2:36:59 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
*Newdow is a pitiful little man with way too much time on his hands. Why doesn’t he move to Cuba? *

There are all kinds of atheist countries that he can flee to escape from freedom. He can go to Cuba and get a ration of 16 eggs a month or Venezuela and be under the rule of the delightful Chavez. Too bad he missed out on Pol pot's regime, or Ceausescu's Romania. Maybe he could’ve been under Stalin's dictatorship.

I bet he'd go to one of those godless counties of the past if he had a time machine.
Too bad for him and all of America that he can't....

34 posted on 06/16/2011 2:46:46 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876 (The only crimes that are 100% preventable are crimes committed by illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9

If this jerk lived in the Midwest or South, it would have happened already.


35 posted on 06/16/2011 2:48:13 PM PDT by libertymaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Newdow is a pitiful little man with way too much time on his hands. Why doesn’t he move to Cuba? Personally, I would like to beat the crap out of him, but that wouldn’t be very Christian of me.

If you were to beat the crap out of this clown, the only thing left would be a pair of shoes.

36 posted on 06/16/2011 2:50:00 PM PDT by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
There were no recorded dissents, so it's fair to assume that no Justice wanted to hear the case.

I'm not sure where the court ever records and announces the votes on cert hearings. The orders that come out of the court only list the cases rejected, maybe mentioning that one justice or another did not take part in that decision.

Here's the actual order list from the Court. Newdow's case is "Freedom From Religion Foundation v. US"

37 posted on 06/16/2011 4:35:12 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
I'm not sure where the court ever records and announces the votes on cert hearings.

There are sometimes recorded dissents from denial of cert. ("Justice X would have granted cert."), occasionally even accompanied by dissenting opinions, though there were none in today's order list.

38 posted on 06/16/2011 5:04:52 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What a non-story. When the Pledge is recited in my town, we vets add “under God” and keep right on going. The ones that didn’t look embarrassed.


39 posted on 06/16/2011 5:54:04 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I don’t beleive the pledge of Allegiance is an honest act.

Allegiance should be earned not given, and as such to make little kids who are by nature ignorant of the state of any goverment Pledge their Allegiance to that goverment is a kind to making drones out of otherwise free men.

It is like saying that the Government exist for its own sake and not for the sake of the people, cause it forces them people to pledge their unwavering Allegiance to itself.

No in a Free Republic Allegiance is earned not pledged.


40 posted on 06/16/2011 6:22:05 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson