You know one thing that gets me? If you say that recognition of homosexuality today will lead to something like bestiality tomorrow they will accuse you of the “slippery slope fallacy.” Yet what are they doing when they say that opposition to homosexuality is like jim crow? Aren’t they doing the “slippery slope” in reverse?
In the 70’s, who would have thought there was any hope for the SBC.
Well Done!
RE: Aren’t they doing the “slippery slope” in reverse?
There are two assumptions they make in their arguments:
1) Homosexuality is like skin color. Therefore if it is morally wrong to discriminate against people of different color, it is also morally wrong to discriminate against Homosexuality.
2) Because skin color is immutable, gayness is immutable also.
Both of the above premises are wrong IMHO.
In my experience, the slope slips only to the Left