Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rise of the Democratic Super-Secret PACs.
Red State ^ | 6/17/11 | Moe Lane

Posted on 06/18/2011 6:28:29 AM PDT by randita

The Rise of the Democratic Super-Secret PACs.

Posted by Moe Lane

Friday, June 17th at 7:00PM EDT

Super PACs are, of course, the political groups that were set up after the Supreme Court’s landmark free speech decision in Citizens United: they are able to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money advocating both for and against political candidates, but may not donate to those candidates directly. The Left ostensibly hates them, which did not stop them from using them to raise over 28 million dollars in the 2010 election cycle (44% of total Super PAC fundraising) to the Right’s over 35 million (54%: the other 2% hedged their bets); their general argument is that allowing groups to openly spending money expressing their opinions on candidates is corrosive to American democracy. ‘Openly’ is the key here: Super PACs must generally disclose their donors.

The generally is… the interesting bit.

OpenSecrets will take the reader most of the way there, but not quite (can’t imagine why): you see, there’s a loophole in this system. A nonprofit organization does not have to disclose its donors; so a Super PAC that receives a donation from a nonprofit has effectively received an anonymous donation. OpenSecrets found five Super PACs that received most of their revenue this way: New Power PAC (NPP), ProgressOhio (PO), Environment Colorado Action Fund (ECAF), Protecting America’s Retirees (PAR), and the National Association of Realtors Congressional Fund (NRC). All five groups received between 88% and 100% of their total funding from precisely one group per Super PAC: they are fairly obviously being used by their parent groups to hide their donors - in a perfectly legal manner, mind you. Total amount being hid this way? Just over 1.4 million dollars: which is not a bad amount of money to licitly launder.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; campaigns; citizensunited; donations; ecaf; environmentcolorado; newpowerpac; pac; progressohio
Soros?
1 posted on 06/18/2011 6:28:32 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: randita

try...billions of our tax monies..laundered thru “stimulus”...


2 posted on 06/18/2011 6:31:36 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo
Realtors are doing so well under Obama.
3 posted on 06/18/2011 6:34:42 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randita
Democrats rulers are ,the Bilderbergs..Read about that bunch of scum rich people..

http://www.4rie.com/rie%203.html

In 2008 during the presidential runs Hilliary and Barrock went together to a meeting along with other names that everyone would recognize.Doesn't it seem odd Hillary and her enemy at the time would go together..Just read all about the criminals they will take over the world and have already got a good start..

4 posted on 06/18/2011 6:45:47 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

Won’t be long before the “sorass” mass of gift card donations begin for nobama, just like in 08.

Then again, sorass may be fed up with pissin his hard stolen money away on the failed Won.


5 posted on 06/18/2011 6:55:55 AM PDT by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLD
I try to figure who the Republican "bilderberg" candidate is. Michelle Bachman, no, Sarah Palin, no, no that is why the establishment hates her, Ron Paul hell no. Romney, yes, TPaw, maybe yes and Huntsman hell yes.

Just a hunch, if Rick Perry gets in the race, he will win the the R primary and then beat Obama, I have a very bad feeling about him.

6 posted on 06/18/2011 6:58:38 AM PDT by thirst4truth (The left elected a mouth that is unattached to an eye, brain or muscle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth
You would be very surprised who is on that list of people that belong to that thing..Just find lots of info about them and read, I did that..And yes I do think Romney is a member..As for Sarah and Michelle no I do not beleive either woman is a member..For one they don't have the kind of money the others have and another they are to nice and won't take guff off any of the democrats.. I really think Rick Perry will have a chance to win the primarys and yes he would beat the pants off Obama..As far as I know Perry would get this country going again.. If the Bilderbergs have their way Obama will win again..Soros is Obama's sugar daddy also his baby sitter and is a good member of the the group.
7 posted on 06/18/2011 7:15:08 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mo
try...billions of our tax monies..laundered thru “stimulus”...

Bingo!

8 posted on 06/18/2011 7:17:58 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (And, therefore, isn't Jim (Robinson) the original Blog Father? - FReeper Aevery_Freeman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson