Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons; All

I was at brunch just today with several (7, 8 counting me) conservative, accomplished, church-going wives and moms, all of whom are involved in politics in one way or the other. None of them currently support Sarah Palin. One other woman and myself probably came the closest when we said we’d vote for her if she is the nominee. No one else would make that commitment.

Calling women catty and telling them that they couldn’t possibly be as pretty as Sarah Palin or that they are jealous isn’t the way to win over minds for your candidate.

But since women are only half of the electorate, I’m sure the name callers feel that Sarah Palin’s campaign can succeed without them.

Right?

And addressing women’s actual concerns is probably just stupid.

Right?


123 posted on 06/18/2011 9:07:16 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: mountainbunny
I have no idea just WHY you thought to post that to me. I didn't make the idiotic claim about how Plain looks, vis-a-vis how other women look, call any woman "catty", nor "jealous".

Are YOU feeling inferior?

Are your "friends" really all that well informed about ALL who are/might be candidates for the primary?

Who are they for?

Yes, women do turn out to vote and like many men, are ill/uniformed, vote with their feelings, and/or just vote for a party. That's how we got stuck with Onabam, Clinton, Carter, and a whole lot of other dreadful presidents/presidential candidates.

How about remarking on this article, or at least, my posts, when replying to me? That would make far more sense than what you've done.

134 posted on 06/18/2011 9:16:36 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: mountainbunny

“One other woman and myself probably came the closest when we said we’d vote for her if she is the nominee. No one else would make that commitment.”

First of all I question the sincerity of your invented anecdote. But if it were real, and then would not vote for Palin over Obama......they are NOT conservatives, they are pretending to be conservatives.


149 posted on 06/18/2011 9:24:15 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Murdering unborn children is the highest sacrament in the liberal religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: mountainbunny
And addressing women’s actual concerns is probably just stupid.

Can you enumerate the concerns of women that have not been addressed by GOvernor Palin?
158 posted on 06/18/2011 9:27:35 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: mountainbunny
Calling women catty and telling them that they couldn’t possibly be as pretty as Sarah Palin or that they are jealous isn’t the way to win over minds for your candidate.

You're right. A lot of people get really upset when the light of truth is shined upon them.

244 posted on 06/19/2011 12:35:06 AM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: mountainbunny
Calling women catty and telling them that they couldn’t possibly be as pretty as Sarah Palin or that they are jealous isn’t the way to win over minds for your candidate.

These women aren't rejecting Palin on the basis of logical analysis and reason.

Mrroww Ffffft.

They're jealous, just as Rush's caller pointed out.

Case in point, my wife.

She's 5' 9", blonde, leggy, and has an IQ > 140.

But for some odd reason, she adores Palin.

QED.

Cheers!

259 posted on 06/19/2011 5:29:35 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson