Posted on 06/19/2011 1:02:01 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Good facts but may I add that NOT all cervical cancer is linked to HPV. There have been people diagnosed with a pre-cervical cancer or cervical cancer and are negative with HPV. Bravo on the stats!!
Stupid decision. The schools heavily push for these vaccines and the average parent just complies. Yes, you can opt out but few parent sheep even bother.
Gardasil is a vaccine that does more harm than good. Plenty have died and thousands have damage. This vaccine supposedly at best keeps you from getting some of the many varieties of HPV. Plenty of the non covered varieties can still lead to cancer. At any rate, HPV does not usually lead to cancer and is treatable if a sexually active person gets regular checkups.
The whole vaccine is pointless for all but drug addled prostitutes.
But the makers want more customers: in parenting magazines right now, they have taken out huge pages of ads scaring parents to get their boys covered too. It’s a huge scam and perry should admit his mistake.
Ain’t you got google on your computer?
How does this have anything to do with Rick Perry and his vaccine order for protection against 4 HPV strains four years ago that could be opted out of and that was never put into effect?
If you do not know the typical staging, pathology,
treatments for girls and women afflicted with
cervical carcinoma, including their outcomes
(including 30 year disease free survival rates),
then what the heck are you defending the RINO Perry for,
in the first place?
Why are you wasting everyone’s time,
including mine?
Well effin’ DUH!
Why are you wasting everyone’s time, including mine?
Since I always provide links for my information (and I am quite generous with my time). I will conclude you have nothing more to say on the topic.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you for giving that information.
Which topic, darln’? The one you started with, the one you changed it to, the one you rechanged it to, or the one you re-restarted with? LOL. This was so cool!!! Look at this! A whole worthless crap thread with 168 posts~ Ain’t you just so proud of yerself?
A little early for the bottle isn’t it?
It is precisely those things that caused me to initially support Perry. However, the gardasil and TTC both have caused me to take a step back and .
He appears to be a man that can be bought. I don’t want that in a leader. I’m not completely discounting him but those 2 issues keep surfacing and they have not been explained in a satisfactory manner or in a way that makes me feel comfortable. In fact, this article that you posted only caused me greater concern.
And that is your choice.
As opposed to how sad it is for an individual on FR spending so much time bashing a conservative named Sarah Palin?
“A little early for the bottle isn’t it?”
Why? you offerin’?
Baby doesn’t do bottles anymore. She’s three now. Either way. Thanks for askin’. Mighty hospitable of ya.
OK. I'm foaming at the mouth now.
I am in Texas. I was *here* when all of this was going on and I was one of the thousands of parents who was dealing with this when it happened.
What I founnd was that, yes, I could fill out a conscientious objection affidavit and my daughter would not get the shot. BUT that meant that my daughter could not receive ANY other vaccines. She couldn't get MMR or pneumonia. Part of the reason that I didn't want my daughter to get this shot is that she's already immunocompromised. She does need vaccines, but I didn't want her to get *this* one because it was too new and I didn't know how it's react with her messed up immune system.
So I'd have had no choice. I'd have had to pull my daughter out of the public school system or submit to the shot. There was no way that a parent could avoid getting their daughter this shot, but allow her to get others. It was an all-or nothing proposition.
And it wasn't just that this was an unproven vaccine that was too new which was the problem. There were very real moral implications for giving a girl this vaccine.
Perry *was* forcing this vaccine on Texan girls. I was there and I was fighting with a thousand others to get this to STOP.
The Merck scandal was what caused him to back down on the issue.
Texans were highly outraged that this was done by executive order and didn’t go through the legislature. The legality of that was questioned.
In our eyes, the whole thing was hinkey.
Palins the one trying to win seats, not lose them, so she drug his sorry a** across the finish line.
This is not spin. Perry pushed this on us Texans and it was such a stink here he finally backtracked.
Correct. Especially with the Obama runs against Bush, again. To soon for another Texas govenor.
Yes it happened, yes Perry was wrong, but I am looking for someone who can beat Obama, that can bury mittens in the primary, and Perry can do both.
Is he perfect? no. Is he at least as conservative as Bush? yes, and probably a little more so. Is he head and shoulders better than Obama? easily? would I trust him to replace one of the conservative judges on the supreme court? yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.