Case closed ... on you.
I was NOT for Bush legitimizing Kadaffy and establishing normal relations with him. It was wrong.
I have NEVER supported ANY President making deals with Kadaffy!
You don't know what the hell you are typing about!
YOU are the one who supported Bush's and Obama's appeasement of the terrorist Kadaffy! Not I! So look in the mirror, buddy!
Libya's Pan Am Atrocity - April 22, 2003 - The Bush Administration has continued negotiations started by Bill Clinton that may settle this case by letting the dictatorship of Libya pay financial awards to families of the victims and take some form of responsibility for the crime....The deal included an agreement, which was kept secret for over a year, in which Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi was promised that the trial would not "undermine" his regime. This was viewed as a guarantee not to charge Gadhafi or his top aides. Dan Cohen, who lost his daughter Theodora in the bombing, responded, "Why shouldn’t we undermine the Libyan regime? The same group of murderous thugs who ordered the bombing are still there in Libya."Susan Cohen has warned against any deal that lets Libyan dictator Gadhafi or his regime escape responsibility for the 1988 bombing. She says, "My child has been killed by Gadhafi, and I want to see him pay, not rehabilitated." Of course she means "pay" with his life.
Here are a sample of my other anti-Kadaffy posts over the years:
Gadhafi Becomes Africa's Imperialist Pig - December 18, 2002
The Good Tyrant - Qaddafi: The New Castro? - The media's new favorite dictator - August 6, 2003
Dissidents Tell of Torture, Secret Prisons, Executions Under Libyan Regime - March 01, 2004
So, no, sorry it wasn't I who was cheering our government's refusal to punish America's enemies, you have me confused with someone else, yourself maybe. You shouldn't make so many assumptions and then you won't be so damn wrong so much!
Seems everyone is avoiding this thread.