Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court sides with Wal-Mart in huge sex bias lawsuit
msnbc ^ | 20 june 2011

Posted on 06/20/2011 9:13:07 AM PDT by rellimpank

— The Supreme Court blocked the largest sexual-discrimination lawsuit ever from proceeding as a class action on Monday, handing a victory to Wal-Mart in a case that pitted the massive retailer against millions of its female employees.

The court’s decision could have broad implications for workers seeking jointly to sue their employers.

The justices overturned an earlier U.S. appeals court ruling that gave class-action status to 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees, past and present, seeking billions of dollars in a suit accusing the retailer of paying women less and giving them fewer promotions at the company

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: discrimination; lawsuit; ruling; scotus; walmart; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: UCANSEE2

It’s done purposely to hold you up and it seems to be working!

How the heck would I know how to explain individual instances of stupid men or women?


21 posted on 06/20/2011 9:54:29 AM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

LOL! yes, I often wonder where they think they are.


22 posted on 06/20/2011 9:55:36 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: anglian
Wow.....At least 4 out of the 5 appear to be morbidly obese. All 5 are definitely obese.

Unless they have some extraordinary resume that isn't being considered, I really wouldn't want them as a top rep.

23 posted on 06/20/2011 10:02:22 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

Men will NEVER ask for directions. Always amusing...


24 posted on 06/20/2011 10:03:23 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

The Communist Judges vs. The American Judges.


25 posted on 06/20/2011 10:04:06 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Socialism...Easier said than done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Celebrate a just SCOTUS decision - slap a lawyer today!


26 posted on 06/20/2011 10:20:00 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“Woman are different than men. They aren’t as strong, have less endurance, aren’t as tall, and have different dispositions as well. They should be paid accordingly.”

Lawrence? Dr. Lawrence Summers? Is that you?


27 posted on 06/20/2011 10:21:39 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Silly, everyone knows women should be paid for their 1) looks, 2) willingness to sit there and look pretty, and 3) ability to cook. Bonuses are paid for child bearing ability but thats usually only applicable after a huge investment in training. Willingness to get drinks and/or snacks during the game are also considerations.


28 posted on 06/20/2011 10:23:14 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
You really think these Wal-Mart greeters are puttin' out?

Pa-THET-ic. And I don't mean the greeters.

29 posted on 06/20/2011 10:24:21 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ((Rolls eyes.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
That's why God made ...

.


30 posted on 06/20/2011 10:28:18 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (There are two theories about arguing with a woman. Neither works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I worked at a Walmart warehouse for 12 years alongside women. They were expected to work at the same rate as me and they did, day in and day out. Some were pretty nice looking. I could out lift almost all of them if I needed to but they certainly pulled their weight.

Women also have better manual dexterity than men, and as a result were better at some jobs and could wipe the floor with me if they chose. I certainly wouldn’t want to be paid less due to their superior abilities.


31 posted on 06/20/2011 10:32:31 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
So are you saying that women are no different, in any way, than men?

Elinor Smeal, is that you?

32 posted on 06/20/2011 10:33:15 AM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

From 2005

Indeed, suing Wal-Mart is now a cottage industry, with some 5,000 lawsuits filed against the company each year. http://www.forbes.com/2005/11/09/wal-mart-lawsuits-cx_tvr_1109walmart.html?partner=weekly_newsletter A Zogby Poll...found that 85% of frequent Wal-Mart shoppers pulled the lever for President Bush in 2004, and that 88% of people who never shop there voted for John Kerry.
By LIZ PEEK | August 24, 2006
“What is behind all the furor, and what exactly are Democratic candidates hoping to gain by jumping on the anti-Wal-Mart bandwagon? It’s about unions, or the lack thereof, in Wal-Mart’s employee ranks. A review of the major anti-Wal-Mart organizations campaigning against the company reveals that they are all union-funded”.
http://www.nysun.com/business/defending-a-vilified-wal-mart/38463/


33 posted on 06/20/2011 10:36:01 AM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
The Communist Judges vs. The American Judges

That's an important point!

With the 5 to 4 decision, Walmart was one Justice away from having to increase their prices to pay off a multi-billion dollar suit. Walmart stock would have declined hurting private retirement accounts.

We were one Justice away from a massive redistribution of wealth.

The Supreme Court alone is reason enough to prevent the election of any future Marxist (Dimocrat) presidents.

34 posted on 06/20/2011 10:52:39 AM PDT by CharlyFord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: anglian
You are correct. The attack on Walmart is fueled by union(communist) activists. It's about the redistribution of Walmart's wealth.

And, we are one SCOTUS Justice away from them scoring some huge victories.

35 posted on 06/20/2011 11:00:34 AM PDT by CharlyFord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
I never said woman couldn't do ANYTHING better than men, I said they were different. To deny this is siding with the militant, radical femiNazis. Women do some things much better than men. But in fields where men excel; pro football, golf, basketball, firefighting, police, military (front line), they should be paid appropriate to their abilities, or restricted from entry into the field at all.
36 posted on 06/20/2011 11:03:19 AM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Emotionally handicapped? Should sue under the disabilities act.


37 posted on 06/20/2011 11:25:16 AM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

Thanks, Vulcan!!


38 posted on 06/20/2011 11:46:18 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The first duty of intelligent men of our day is the restatement of the obvious. " - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Stephanie Odle - "I’m a single mother, and I have a 6-month-old child to support."

"Christine Kwapnoski, a 46-year-old single mother of two."

No info on the rest of them. Those are just the two I searched.

39 posted on 06/20/2011 11:50:16 AM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord
With the 5 to 4 decision, Walmart was one Justice away from having to increase their prices to pay off a multi-billion dollar suit. Walmart stock would have declined hurting private retirement accounts. We were one Justice away from a massive redistribution of wealth.

The main part of the ruling was 9-0. Everyone agreed the class certified by the 9th Circuit could not be maintained. The four dissenters would have sent the case back to give the plaintiffs a shot at trying to certify a narrower class, under a tougher standard.

40 posted on 06/20/2011 12:05:40 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson