Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Democrat) Rep. Alcee Hastings investigated for sexual harassment
yahoo ^ | 6/22/2011 | By Rachel Rose Hartman

Posted on 06/22/2011 8:24:39 AM PDT by tobyhill

Hours after Rep. Anthony Weiner's resignation became official, a sexual harassment case involving Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) resurfaced.

Gary Fields and Brody Mullins report for the Wall Street Journal that the independent Office of Congressional Ethics is now investigating a claim that Hastings sexually harassed a woman working on his staff.

Fields and Mullins write that the Office investigation was opened after conservative group Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in March as the legal counsel for Republican staffer Winsome Packer. Packer, who served on the U.S. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe--a group headed by the congressman--alleges that Hastings retaliated when Packer attempted to report the harassment, according to the paper. Judicial Watch has targeted Hastings in the past.

Accusations include "unwelcome sexual advances," and "unwelcome touching," according to March reports of the lawsuit. Packer had accused Hastings of offering her invitations to his hotel room, asking inappropriate questions in public including "What kind of underwear are you wearing?" as well as pressuring her to give him gifts and donate to his re-election campaign.

Hastings, a 74-year-old 10-term lawmaker, strongly denies all charges. He stated back in March when reports of the lawsuit became public that he "never sexually harassed anyone."

"That is a certainty: In a race with a lie, the truth always wins. And when the truth comes to light and the personal agendas of my accusers are exposed, I will be vindicated."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alceehastings; cultureofcorruption; hastings; sexualharassment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2011 8:24:43 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
He should call this attorney for counsel. Maybe even a little consoloing
 
  

2 posted on 06/22/2011 8:27:06 AM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

How can that be?


3 posted on 06/22/2011 8:28:27 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Wouldn’t it be racist to even make the accusation?


4 posted on 06/22/2011 8:29:06 AM PDT by libs_kma (JIMMY CARTER - HE'S BACK IN BLACK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Accusations include "unwelcome sexual advances," and "unwelcome touching,"....as well as pressuring her to give him gifts and donate to his re-election campaign.

Now THAT is the height of sleazy, not only was he trying to get her in the sack, he also wanted HER to buy him gifts and donate to his reelection. Typically even the most hardcore philanderer buys the women he's wooing gifts. This guy is not only a sleaze, he's a cheapskate as well.

5 posted on 06/22/2011 8:30:51 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Sigh. This means the MSM is going have to start talking about David Vitter again, right? He seems to be their primary line of defense when a Democrat has a sex scandal.
6 posted on 06/22/2011 8:31:00 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

(that's Winsome on the L; Alcee on the R.)

7 posted on 06/22/2011 8:31:05 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Typical democrap:

Judicial career

[edit] Overview

In 1977, he became a judge of the circuit court of Broward County, Florida. In 1979, he was appointed by President Carter as a U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida.

[edit] Impeachment

In 1981, Hastings was charged with accepting a $150,000 bribe in exchange for a lenient sentence and a return of seized assets for 21 counts of racketeering by Frank and Thomas Romano, and of perjury in his testimony about the case. He was acquitted by a jury after his alleged co-conspirator, William Borders, refused to testify in court (resulting in a jail sentence for Borders).

In 1988, the Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives took up the case, and Hastings was impeached for bribery and perjury by a vote of 413-3. He was then convicted in 1989 by the United States Senate, becoming the sixth federal judge in the history of the United States to be removed from office by the Senate. The vote on the first article was 69 for and 26 opposed, providing two votes more than the two-thirds of those present that were needed to convict. The first article accused the judge of conspiracy. Conviction on any single article was enough to remove the judge from office. The Senate vote cut across party lines, with Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, voting to convict his fellow party member, and Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, voting to acquit.[1]

The Senate had the option to forbid Hastings from ever seeking federal office again, but did not do so. Alleged co-conspirator, attorney William Borders went to jail again for refusing to testify in the impeachment proceedings, but was later given a full pardon by President Bill Clinton on his last day in office.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcee_Hastings

8 posted on 06/22/2011 8:31:48 AM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma

Of COURSE it’s racist! But not to worry; Nancy will send the complaint to the “ethics committe”, where all democrap problems are never to be heard of again.

And Alcee will keep his job, of course.


9 posted on 06/22/2011 8:32:09 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Besides, Democrats can’t be held responsible when they sexual harrass someone, because hey, it’s not like they campaign specifically against it right? Right?


10 posted on 06/22/2011 8:32:45 AM PDT by libs_kma (JIMMY CARTER - HE'S BACK IN BLACK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
....Office of Congressional Ethics is now investigating a claim that Hastings sexually harassed a woman working on his staff.

Excuse me?

11 posted on 06/22/2011 8:37:03 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I'm a Birther - And a Deather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"Sigh. This means the MSM is going have to start talking about David Vitter again, right? He seems to be their primary line of defense when a Democrat has a sex scandal."

Isn't it the truth?!?!

Just days after the Weiner admission of the whole thing, I saw a knee pad media story, with slideshow no less, titled something like "Politician Sex scandals"...where NINE of the 13 politicians in the slideshow were pubs, and of the 4 dims, one of them wasn't named Clinton... Are ya kidding me??? (No, they weren't kidding)

And CNN did their own expose on political sex scandals, and somehow failed to mention Eliot Spitzer...gee, I wonder why?

It would almost be funny if it wasn't so freakin ridiculous...

12 posted on 06/22/2011 8:40:39 AM PDT by libs_kma (JIMMY CARTER - HE'S BACK IN BLACK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

HEC should finish with Mad Maxine Waters first..


13 posted on 06/22/2011 8:42:44 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joann37

Sad , but true.

By the way has Judicial Watch ever won a case?


14 posted on 06/22/2011 9:07:04 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Thanks for that. Only Democrats would elect an impeached and removed federal judge to congress.


15 posted on 06/22/2011 9:08:21 AM PDT by newzjunkey (a Pigovian tax is a tax intended to shape market outcomes—appropriately named.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Well, Alcee(you tool), you winsome and you losesome.


16 posted on 06/22/2011 9:10:43 AM PDT by RexBeach (Mr. Obama can't count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I’d hit it.


17 posted on 06/22/2011 9:12:25 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joann37

Pardon me, but did the Democrats retake the House while I wasn’t looking?


18 posted on 06/22/2011 9:16:59 AM PDT by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

For fitty bucks.


19 posted on 06/22/2011 9:17:52 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The Obama, Pelosi, Weiner, Hastings Democrats......


20 posted on 06/22/2011 9:33:46 AM PDT by paul in cape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson