Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ozdragon
The real issue is can unit conhesion be maintained with gay people in a unit?

You're asking the wrong question. The nature of the homosexual psychosis is one of selfishness, self-aggrandizing, and a constant need for attention. It's part of why they do what they do. If they can't serve "openly," then they can't be allowed to bring their gay pride parades to us on-post. They can still serve and do great things for their country, but they can't flaunt and scream "look at me!" from the rooftops. With DADT repealed, none of this is the case anymore. They can now make spectacles of themselves, and there's nothing we can do about it in the military since homosexuals are probably the most protected class in all of American politics (Muslims and illegal immigrants being a close tie for second).

In general, I don't have a huge problem with homosexuals in the military, but mostly in the sense of allowing an individual to serve his/her country. It will get far away from that very quickly, mark my words. If it was solely about service, then DADT would've been a perfectly adequate policy.

62 posted on 06/22/2011 8:13:23 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Future Snake Eater; beaversmom
The Annual Marine and Navy Balls were always such lavish affairs, can't wait for the homos and dykes to start bringing their partners to the balls, that will be a sight to behold. Obama's military......

"I get the first dance"

72 posted on 06/22/2011 9:42:18 PM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson