Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

Nope - I just wonder why the Bible doesn’t explicitly say woman on woman is bad like it does man on man...

The biblical view of woman’s sexuality is probably a lot different than in modern times. I wonder if maybe lesbian’s didn’t exist or maybe it was so well hidden that men (all the writers of the bible were men) never imagined that women would or could engage in sex. Maybe the biblical view of sex was like Bill Clinton’s (only penetration = sex) and women lack the equipment so...

Or like I said before maybe the original Hebrew words of the Bible don’t translate as well in regards to lesbians.

But you can’t deny the bible is very explicit about male homosexuality while quite vague in regards to lesbianism.


91 posted on 06/23/2011 11:06:56 PM PDT by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: RC51

It’s only vague in your mind, not in the words, nor in anyone elses’ mind.


92 posted on 06/23/2011 11:10:31 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson