If your answer is "YES", then you must also accept that federal control of health care, the environment and education are in keeping with original understanding.
If your answer is "NO", then how do you justify supporting laws that violate the Constitution?
Is your answer "YES" or is it "NO"?
I don’t think federal prohibition using the commerce clause is in keeping with its original meaning. Nor do I justify it - the questions I ask aren’t generally rhetorical.