Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military leaders know Obama’s decision is a disaster
The Washington Post ^ | 6/24/2011 | Robert Kagan

Posted on 06/24/2011 6:29:58 AM PDT by Lakeshark

The press is reporting that the top military leaders have “endorsed” President Obama’s Afghan troop withdrawal decision. With all due respect to the fine reporters, that is not the news. Under our Constitution, military leaders have no choice but to endorse the president’s decision after giving him their best advice. They could resign, of course, but to have the entire senior military leadership resign over a president’s decision contrary to their advice would be a disaster, and not least for the troops on the ground.

Make no mistake, however. The entire military leadership believes the president’s decision is a mistake, and especially the decision to withdraw the remainder of the surge forces by September 2012. They will soldier on and do their best, but as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, put it, in characteristic understatement, they believe the decision will increase the risk to the troops and increase the chancethat the mission will not succeed. It bears repeating that the deadline imposed by the president has nothing to do with military or strategic calculation. It has everything to do with an electoral calculation. President Obama wants those troops out two months before Americans go to the voting booth.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; kadafki; libya; stuckonstupid; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
The political games this man plays with our troops is shameful. No mistake, he's trying to say "I shot Osama, and won the war and brought the troops home" at the expense of actually winning. He's a disaster.
1 posted on 06/24/2011 6:30:00 AM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

The silly old 1960s military strategy: “We should just declare victory and come home.”


2 posted on 06/24/2011 6:32:40 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

We could sprinkle landmines all over their rat trails like candy but Obama won’t do it.


3 posted on 06/24/2011 6:35:33 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
With all due respect to the fine reporters

Which reporters would those be?

I heard that more US soldiers have died in Afghanistan during Obama's term than died during two Bush terms.

Heard that from these 'fine reporters'?

4 posted on 06/24/2011 6:37:13 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

“They could resign, of course, but”
*****************************

Wisful thinking!!!!!

If a few-no just one!—decent general officer had the guts to do the right thing, things might just start to turn around, as unlikely, as unlikely as a decent general officer resigning might be—the george Pattons, Louie Pullers, etc, have long since been weeded outta the ranks long ag.

Now even the Marine Cosps is overrun from the enemy within Alinsky perversion tactics!!!!

“Then They came For The Marines (Better Men Have Tried...”

On and on...


5 posted on 06/24/2011 6:38:29 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
President Obama wants those troops out two months before Americans go to the voting booth.

Wait. Didn't he "want" those troops out within one year AFTER Americans went to the voting booth?

And besides, the only troops he's talking about bringing home are the same troops he sent there as part of The Surge.

When this guy leaves office (if he ever does), he can make a living as a Three Card Monte dealer on the streets.

6 posted on 06/24/2011 6:38:59 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

increase the chancethat the mission will not succeed
...........................................................
Do these military Commanders even know what the mission is?

What is the Mission?

Bin Laden is dead.Afghanistan will never become a modern country, The Poppy’s and dope are still growing there, The Taliban isn’t going to be destroyed, Most of the people want us gone so they can go back to living in the 12th. century, there is nothing of worth in the whole stinking country. If terrorists do not train there they will train somewhere else.Most of those we hunt in Afghanistan are hiding in Pakistan with the knowledge and consent of the Pakistani’s. Rules of Engagement hinder anything we do includng protecting our troops.

Does anyone really know what our mission there is?

Certainly there is a more important mission right here in America protecting our own border.


7 posted on 06/24/2011 6:40:01 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

“Top military leaders” can also be found to endorse homosexualizing the barracks and troop berthing spaces.

These perfumed princes are actually PC rank-advancement whores once they get stars in their eyes.


8 posted on 06/24/2011 6:40:59 AM PDT by Travis McGee (Castigo Cay is in print and on Kindle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the enemy going to view an announced troop withdrawal as a sign of weakness? Will this not embolden the enemy?

God forbid, if another terror attack against our homeland occurs, would this benefit Obama politically?

9 posted on 06/24/2011 6:41:13 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

See #8. BTW, my new novel is about a former Marine scout-sniper.


10 posted on 06/24/2011 6:42:29 AM PDT by Travis McGee (Castigo Cay is in print and on Kindle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

He wants to take troops from the country’s task of confronting Al Qaeda and spend those troops on HIS project instead: supporting the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic caliphate in the Middle East.


11 posted on 06/24/2011 6:42:39 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I agree with every word in your comment. The upside of this is that Obama will take the hit for “losing Afghanistan” as it will be termed, even though the “mission” (sic) was a fool’s errand from day one.


12 posted on 06/24/2011 6:44:08 AM PDT by Travis McGee (Castigo Cay is in print and on Kindle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

First of all, POTUS Obama has put our troops in harm’s way. Many will be wounded or killed because of this “political decision. Even worse is the harm that will come to the American nation proper in the form of terrorist attacks on our homeland, which Obama has now endorsed, backhandedly. It is almost as if this “Hate America” POTUS Obama has enabled our enemies!!! IMHO, Obama should be impeached!!!


13 posted on 06/24/2011 6:44:37 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
IF America survives, the 0bama regime will be one of the darkest periods in American history.
14 posted on 06/24/2011 6:44:45 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

...the key to this is innocent people are being harmed. His people....muslims....


15 posted on 06/24/2011 6:44:49 AM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

The time table for withdrawal of troops should never have been made public. It was done so only for political gain. It only encourages the Taliban to conserve their resources and attack in force when our military is at its weakest, thus sacrificing our troops for political expediency.


16 posted on 06/24/2011 6:45:01 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Obamania in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
"Under our Constitution, military leaders have no choice but to endorse the president’s decision after giving him their best advice. They could resign, of course, but to have the entire senior military leadership resign over a president’s decision contrary to their advice would be a disaster, and not least for the troops on the ground."

Oh yes....I believe I heard the same thing during the Viet Nam War. What it is really called is lack of commitment, honor, and strength of character. I believe that is one of the comment blocks on an officer's OER. (Read: Officer Efficiency Report.

17 posted on 06/24/2011 6:45:37 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
As people have said, from the very beginning the Taliban has been visiting villages in Afghanistan saying, "The Americans will leave eventually. The foreigners always leave eventually. But we will stay. And we will remmeber where your loyalty lies. So, be friends with the Taliban and not the Americans, or you will pay a price when the Americans leave."

Now we are leaving. Any guesses as to how much support the Afghan villages will be giving us overt the next coupel of years? The situation there is likely to go downhill rapidly. In part because we have fewer troops, and in part because our friends are scared and in part because our enemies are emboldened.

18 posted on 06/24/2011 6:46:07 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

If we have another terror attack, Obama can declare martial law and doesn’t have to worry about elections.

If any of our Congress-critters were actually concerned about the way their actions jeopardize this nation, they might realize that failure to remove this usurper BEFORE he takes the country down that road puts the nation at huge risk. Obama has shown a total disregard for the rule of law, in spite of his own advisors warning him. He is a clear and present danger to this country, and every minute that Congress stands idly by is more time off the ticking time bomb.


19 posted on 06/24/2011 6:47:54 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Peace through strength surrender is insane.
20 posted on 06/24/2011 6:49:26 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson