So let them sink under the weight of numerous sexually transmitted diseases, and higher death rates due to aforementioned STDs.
The 10th Amendment is still unchanged from its date of ratification. Was the power to say who may be married given to the federal government?
We all agree that the federal government has been out of bounds for a very, very long time. We as Conservatives also need to accept, albeit obviously that Liberals have differing views on practically everything when compared to us.
Whether gay or not, we all have right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. I have no right to tell my family not to desire people of the same sex, and you as an individual don’t have that right either. However, should you want to propose to your entire state to ban gay marriage, then that is completely within your right because it would be put up to a vote.
Our Founders already fought off a monarchy once before, and made it steadfast in a second war. Where would we be should we accept a monarchy again?
Monarchy? Laws against perverion = monarchy?
So I guess you’re a Liberal/tarian. Anything goes as long as it’s vice? But restraint on vice is the big no-no?
I’m not saying “ban desires” - they’re within the mind. That has nothing to do with the state forcing same sex marriage on everyone - recognizing it, cooperating with, photographing it, announcing it in the papers, teaching children about it, giving mentally ill sex perverts other peoples’ children via fostering and adopting, and on and on and on.
And as others have noted, votes of the people are routinely overturned by Federal Judges Gone Wild.
So apparently necrophilia, bestiality and incest would be fine with you if people in a state voted to legalize them.
What does a monarchy have to do with not legalizing sexual perversion in the name of fake marriage?