Posted on 06/24/2011 8:52:17 PM PDT by AustralianConservative
BS
There are obviously some things society should not be tolerant of.
Yeah. Christian conservatives are just so much worse to homosexuals than barbaric Muslims are to homosexuals.
Liberalism is not only a mental disorder, but fundamentally, it’s a spriritual disorder.
AMEN!
The intolerant gays are the bad guys in this article.
Yeah, try selling this "marriage" in Iran. Let's see how tolerant and enlightened muslims really are.
Tolerance? LOL
Don’t make me laugh. I;m in Hollywood and the faggots are the most INTOLERANT bastards aside from liberals I know of. You say something that you disagree with and they pounce on you like Muslims on a white woman. I’ve seen it firsthand here. They have liberal politicians doing their dirty work to pass laws because they know the populace disagrees with their degenerate puke lifestyle.
And a city full of AID/HIV TEST billboards at every major intersection. Yep, I love L.A. (VOMIT0
....................................
It's the tolerant people who stifle debate and urge the shunning of the "intolerant". It's the tolerant ones who shout down the "intolerant" in public forums. Whenever I learn that someone is tolerant, I prepare myself for vicious personal attacks and backstabbing attempts to silence opposition.
“Whatever one thinks about the pros and cons of gay marriage, a tolerant society cannot deny the right of homosexual couples to formalise their relationship.”
An opinion stated as fact.
Otherwise known as bullshit.
“Whatever one thinks about the pros and cons of gay marriage, a tolerant society cannot deny the right of homosexual couples to formalise their relationship.”
An opinion stated as fact.
Otherwise known as bullshit.
“Let’s see how tolerant and enlightened muslims really are. “
Hanging can be considered “tolerance”, right?
Yeah, I agree, that statement sounds sanctimonious too.
Im also aware that homosexual domestic violence is very high (another fact you dont read in the media).
You can't forgive and get past this deplorable, false statement:
"Whatever one thinks about the pros and cons of gay marriage, a tolerant society cannot deny the right of homosexual couples to formalise their relationship."
“Yeah, I agree, that statement sounds sanctimonious too.”
It’s otherwise a very good article.
The article goes on to paint “tolerance” in a bad light.
Exactly. It's a direct attack on the Judeo-Christian underpinnings of our society and culture. Without those, any sort of activity will be considered OK, and that's what they want.
They use the compassion of Christians against us, by appealing to Christians who have lost their tether to morality, and making them feel bad for being judgemental about someone else's behavior. The homosexual activists want to engage in any sort of activity that might be considered sinful, and they don't want anyone to pass judgement on their behavior.
This can be done without any sort of 'marriage'. Activists convince those who are wavering that they HAVE to be able to marry because they can't do the things that married people can do like inherit property, make decisions for each other in the hospital, etc. The truth is they CAN do those things with legal contracts, etc.
Civil Unions would do the trick, and they could be set up so that any two people could take advantage of them. A single man could form a civil union with his elderly mother, or two elderly sisters or brothers could do so, so that decisions could be made easily without any interference by any civil authorities. Setting them up this way would remove the notion of them being especially for homosexuals, and take the idea of 'homosexual marriage' off the table, because marriage would be unnecessary to attain the things they say they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.