I'm sorry, but I must disagree. Wallace went further than anyone would expect from an MSM talking head. He flatly admitted he was wrong to do what he did. The fact that Bachmann was not gracious in accepting his explanation and "apology" is a mark against her in my book.
Christians are held to a higher standard than socialist humanist liberals. Bachmann has used her faith as part of her resume. By refusing to accept whatever apology was offered and turning the other cheek and then whining about how insulting it was for anyone to saying that a presidential candidate is not a serious candidate, when her principle political advisor did the exact same thing to Sarah Palin is simply not acceptable in my book.
She needs to go out in public and tell the world that she holds no animosity to Wallace and that she appreciates the fact that he saw the error of his ways.
It is the right thing to do.
>>Wallace went further than anyone would expect from an MSM talking head. He flatly admitted he was wrong to do what he did. The fact that Bachmann was not gracious in accepting his explanation and “apology” is a mark against her in my book.<<
Wallace got creamed by his audience. He apologized to them.
You are saying just what Kos and Huffpo are saying. Isn’t that strange?
It is also the right answer. She would then have more media time spreading the message across the nation that Wallace publicly stated he was wrong. You can't buy that kind of coverage if you think about it....a guy saying he was wrong about you.