You still have EVERY Right to stop your children from watching, playing or reading anything YOU think is 'violent' or you just don't like. It's that the State or YOU cannot stop other people from allowing their children access to that 'violence' or 'stuff' that *may offend* you.
So this reinforces YOUR Rights ('Your' as in We The People).
You read it wrong.
You want to remove my right to representation within my community and state and have me confine myself and my children to some sort of personal bubble in order to keep them from the anarchy that you want imposed by the dictatorship of the elite rulers in black robes.
You are promoting dictatorship. There are plenty of dictatorial countries where people have no right to representation. You want that here.
You have no idea what you’re talking about. The ruling says that the law is unconstitutional because it’s a violation of the child’s Constitutional rights. That means the child has the RIGHT under the Constitution to purchase these video games.
This isn’t about allowing parents to oversee their kids. It’s exactly the opposite.
So by your standard we have no right to representation on the ‘age of consent’ then as well. Why should anyone have the right to say when someone else’s children are ready to engage in sexual relations.
Total BS. You are pushing libertarian anarchy that leads to dictatorship.