Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Culture Challenge of the Week: Untrustworthy Media Ratings
Townhall.com ^ | June 28, 2011 | Rebecca Hagelin

Posted on 06/28/2011 9:15:50 AM PDT by Kaslin

How many times have you judged a movie by its cover and its rating? As the summer gets underway parents across the country are fielding multiple requests from their kids to rent movies and/or head to the theatre to see the latest release. Many fine parents rely only on the Hollywood-drafted descriptions and Hollywood-created ratings system to determine which movies their sons and daughters can watch. But relying on Hollywood is a big mistake.

The truth is, Hollywood peppers –and often fills - movies they claim are appropriate for children with sex and violence.

Research verifies what savvy parents know by experience: harmful media content abounds, from sexual dialogue and explicit sex, to intense violence and brutality, to foul and blasphemous language.

And exposure to harmful media has real life consequences. For example, a major Rand study showed that teens who watch the most sexual content on TV are twice as likely to become sexually active, at earlier ages, than teens who view the least. Numerous studies show that a steady diet of TV or video game violence increases aggression and behavioral problems in children. And the entertainment industry’s relentless assault on religion and traditional values undermines our children’s morality as much as their psychological health.

(Hollywood’s not even bashful about promoting its liberal agenda to our children. In interviews with culture expert and author Ben Shapiro, top producers and TV executives spoke freely about their efforts to normalize homosexual behavior and to spread the liberal gospel.)

So how can good parents decide what programs, movies, or games their children should watch (or play) this summer?

Forget the media ratings. Check the media content instead.

Children are often quick to ‘reassure’ their parents that a hoped-for movie, video game or TV show must be age-appropriate because the rating says so. (“I’m 14 and it’s only rated PG-13”). But media ratings are not truly independent of the entertainment industry; producers, creators, and profit-seeking media companies all weigh in. And their criteria and judgments don’t reflect what most parents think. Age ratings offer a “ballpark” estimate of the product’s target audience, but little guidance about the product’s actual content. “Ratings creep” makes the rating even less reliable, as the same movie that’s now rated PG-13 would have been rated R years earlier.

A new study published this month (June 2011) in the journal Pediatrics shows that fewer than half of all parents typically consult the movie industry’s ratings and only about a third of parents check TV or video game ratings. Some don’t bother to check out ratings because they just don’t care what’s in a movie at all – they foolishly let their children watch anything they want. But others just don’t trust the ratings – and for good reason.

According to the study, the ratings also don’t tell caring parents what they really want to know: “What’s in it?”

More than anything else, careful parents value specific content information about the levels of violence, sexual content, adult themes and offensive language within a movie, game, or program. And there’s good reason for that too.

How to Save Your Family: Become Media-Wise

Accurate information puts parents in charge. It lets us decide what content is appropriate for our own children, according to our own values. Not surprisingly, religious beliefs strongly influence most parents’ decisions about age-appropriate media content. For example, 45% of regular worshippers would shield their children from dialogue about alternative lifestyles while only 22% of less-frequent worshippers would do so.

So where can parents turn for accurate media information? Try these three excellent resources:

Parents Television Council provides content information, reviews, and research on media trends.

Pluggedin.com, sponsored by Focus on the Family, offers valuable, content-based reviews of movies, video games and music.

Screenit.com provides extremely detailed information on current and classic movies.

Protect your children from adults who don’t share your values and are on a mission to thwart your influence. If you believe a movie is inappropriate for your child, explain why and then commit to securing an alternative that works for both of you.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: movies; ratings

1 posted on 06/28/2011 9:15:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Children have the Constitutional right to see anything they want. They don’t need parental approval. Isn’t that what the SC said?


2 posted on 06/28/2011 9:26:57 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

No. The SC said that parents are the ones that determine what their children watch and or play, not the Government.


3 posted on 06/28/2011 9:53:52 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Durus

USSupCo: Can’t ban violent video game sales to kids

http://www.bucyrustelegraphforum.com/article/20110628/NEWS01/106280305/USSupCo-Can-t-ban-violent-video-game-sales-kids

“sales to kids” - not to parents.


4 posted on 06/28/2011 10:03:32 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
To constantly have to protect your children by reading and reviewing each game, movie, TV program etc. places an impossible burden on decent parents. That is one reason why we need responsible censorship rather than “Free Speech” fanatics. Society should help by passing good laws instead of promoting absolute license. We had good movies in the 1940’s and 50’s, the actors and plots were a darn sight better than today. The only improvment today over yesterday is in the special effects, sound and camera techniques.
5 posted on 06/28/2011 10:19:58 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Are you stating that parents are not in control of the spending habits of their children?


6 posted on 06/28/2011 10:38:41 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
"Responsible censorship" because parenting places an impossible burden on parents? I really hope you are being sarcastic but I fear you are not.

No real conservative wants Government in the role of a parent and there is no constitutional authority for Government to take this role.

7 posted on 06/28/2011 10:44:52 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Durus

Well, I often see kids that look like minors at the mall and other retail stores without parents with them, so maybe. Can’t make a blanket statement about all kids, though.


8 posted on 06/28/2011 10:52:13 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

If you see unattended minors buying items don’t you think that they have either explicit or tacit approval to buy said items?


9 posted on 06/28/2011 11:09:43 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Durus

LOL. No. I also know minors buy drugs. I doubt they have any sort of parental approval. They also buy alcohol. I am not so naive as to believe children always obey the wishes of their parents. If your kids do, be very thankful for wonderful kids!


10 posted on 06/28/2011 11:20:55 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Durus

The fact that we have government schools prove differently.

In loco parentis

There are several reasons why violations of student rights are upheld by the courts. One of the most basic reasons is known as in loco parentis. This Latin phrase basically means that while a student is in the custody of a school, the school can and often should act as a parent. In this duty of the school, many decisions can be made that are outside the normal governmental purview.

http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_stud.html


11 posted on 06/28/2011 11:24:12 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
The "modern educational system" ie:Government schools, which were designed from their inception to be socialist indoctrination centers, proves that government should be kept as far away from children as possible. It demonstrates that the founders knew what they were doing when they didn't give government the enumerated power to control schools.

When a parent fails to be perfect, or a child fails to obey perfectly, it does not mean that government spontaneously gains additional powers.

Being a parent isn't easy but Government as a Parent is a nightmare.

12 posted on 06/28/2011 12:58:06 PM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Durus
I lived through the times of the censorship of movies and how we survived I'll never know. One would think Thousands died, children were drug from their mother's arms and executed before their eyes in a veritable reign of terror. Nonsense, people were more free in the 1930's than at anytime today. Today, people babble of free speech and wither at a claim of "racism," PC censorship rules the day, schools cannot have prayer, the press cannot report riots and the cause.

What "Free Speech" merely means today is the "right" to print and publish pornography, sedition and treason.

You people are living under a tyranny and oppression to a far greater degree than at anytime in our history. Free Speech-NONSENSE!

13 posted on 06/28/2011 2:22:05 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Durus

So do you agree that laws against children buying alcohol and cigarettes is a good thing?


14 posted on 06/28/2011 2:32:30 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

I would agree with qualifications.


15 posted on 06/29/2011 4:32:59 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson