Replies

If you agree with him, you think what he does is citizen journalism. If you don’t, his work is little more than crowd-sourced political sabotage that freely distorts the facts.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry when I read statements like this from an alleged "newspaper." They say this without any concept that news stories can be verified. Whether Breitbart stories are true or lies is a verifiable matter, not a matter of political perspective. And with one or two misfires, Breitbart pretty much is accurate. He writes fact-grounded stories. As many Libs who work with him attest to.

6 posted on 06/29/2011 3:51:42 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")

Since this article freely distorts the facts I would say Peters is all wee weed up.

Note to Peters. If you did your job, there would be no breitbart. unintended consequences.

7 posted on 06/29/2011 4:13:16 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberals who graduate from Ivy League schools are the dumbest people on the planet.)