Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/30/2011 8:27:34 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Sub-Driver

Yes,Yes one look at his ancestors in Kenya and the Aerospace industries there ,That they created,and YET this Pathetic Buffoon lecturing US ,go away you Nobody.


29 posted on 06/30/2011 9:48:51 AM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Obama's finally losing it.

I think McConnell collared him in the Oval Office Monday. Obama was shown up for the juvenile, knee-jerk demogogue that he is when he likely had NO logical answers for the Senate Minority Leader.

Obama's blustering yesterday was just to get everyone to see "that he still had it" but everyone's starting to see the real jabbering boob underneath all that politically correct skin.

31 posted on 06/30/2011 10:41:22 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

baraq again bashed another American industry.
It is just a high end industry.

And all the while, he rides around on a hell of a corporate 747 that we pay for.

Maybe someone in the aircraft industry or Boeing ought to remind him of that.


33 posted on 06/30/2011 12:03:24 PM PDT by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...

Corporate Jets Face Flight Fee in Obama Plan
By Alan Levin - Sep 19, 2011

President Barack Obama’s administration proposed a $100 per-flight fee on corporate jets and other turbine-powered planes that use the U.S. air-traffic system.

The fee would raise an estimated $11 billion over 10 years, according to the president’s recommendations to the 12-member congressional committee charged with finding ways to trim the deficit. The fee is aimed at private aircraft, which currently don’t pay their fair share of costs of operating the aviation system, the administration said today.

About two-thirds of the air-traffic system is paid for by aviation excise taxes, including levies on airline tickets and on fuel. Last year these taxes raised $10.8 billion, according to the Department of Transportation.

There is a disparity between what airlines and their passengers pay into the system and what users of private aircraft pay, the plan said.

An airline flight from Los Angeles to San Francisco would generate $1,300 to $2,000 in taxes, depending on the number of passengers and what they paid for tickets. A private jet, which requires almost the same services from air-traffic controllers, would pay about $60 in fuel taxes, the plan said.

“General aviation users currently pay a fuel tax, but this revenue does not cover their fair-share use of air traffic services,” the plan said.
Opposition Mounts

A coalition of nine U.S. associations representing users and manufacturers of corporate and private aircraft issued a joint statement “expressing our unified opposition” to the proposal.

“Mr. President, many foreign countries have imposed per flight charges on general aviation and the results have been devastating,” the e-mail statement said. “Please do not go down the dangerous path and cost jobs in our community.”

General-aviation pilots pay their fair share of fuel taxes and a new fee would create “a costly new federal collection bureaucracy,” the groups said.

The groups that issued the letter include the Washington- based General Aviation Manufacturers Association, whose members include General Dynamics Corp. (GD)’s Gulfstream and Textron Inc. (TXT)’s Cessna; the Washington-based National Business Aviation Association, with members including PepsiCo Inc. and Humana Inc. (HUM), the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, based in Frederick, Maryland, which has more than 400,000 individual members; and the Experimental Aircraft Association in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

NetJets Reacts

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK/A)’s NetJets, the largest U.S. firm selling fractional shares of corporate jets, issued a statement from Chairman and Chief Executive Jordan Hansell agreeing with the trade groups. NetJets, based in Columbus, Ohio, has more than 7,000 customers worldwide.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2011-09-19/corporate-jets-face-100-per-flight-fee-in-obama-deficit-plan.html


34 posted on 09/20/2011 7:55:45 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...

Corporate Jets Face Flight Fee in Obama Plan
By Alan Levin - Sep 19, 2011

President Barack Obama’s administration proposed a $100 per-flight fee on corporate jets and other turbine-powered planes that use the U.S. air-traffic system.

The fee would raise an estimated $11 billion over 10 years, according to the president’s recommendations to the 12-member congressional committee charged with finding ways to trim the deficit. The fee is aimed at private aircraft, which currently don’t pay their fair share of costs of operating the aviation system, the administration said today.

About two-thirds of the air-traffic system is paid for by aviation excise taxes, including levies on airline tickets and on fuel. Last year these taxes raised $10.8 billion, according to the Department of Transportation.

There is a disparity between what airlines and their passengers pay into the system and what users of private aircraft pay, the plan said.

An airline flight from Los Angeles to San Francisco would generate $1,300 to $2,000 in taxes, depending on the number of passengers and what they paid for tickets. A private jet, which requires almost the same services from air-traffic controllers, would pay about $60 in fuel taxes, the plan said.

“General aviation users currently pay a fuel tax, but this revenue does not cover their fair-share use of air traffic services,” the plan said.
Opposition Mounts

A coalition of nine U.S. associations representing users and manufacturers of corporate and private aircraft issued a joint statement “expressing our unified opposition” to the proposal.

“Mr. President, many foreign countries have imposed per flight charges on general aviation and the results have been devastating,” the e-mail statement said. “Please do not go down the dangerous path and cost jobs in our community.”

General-aviation pilots pay their fair share of fuel taxes and a new fee would create “a costly new federal collection bureaucracy,” the groups said.

The groups that issued the letter include the Washington- based General Aviation Manufacturers Association, whose members include General Dynamics Corp. (GD)’s Gulfstream and Textron Inc. (TXT)’s Cessna; the Washington-based National Business Aviation Association, with members including PepsiCo Inc. and Humana Inc. (HUM), the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, based in Frederick, Maryland, which has more than 400,000 individual members; and the Experimental Aircraft Association in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

NetJets Reacts

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK/A)’s NetJets, the largest U.S. firm selling fractional shares of corporate jets, issued a statement from Chairman and Chief Executive Jordan Hansell agreeing with the trade groups. NetJets, based in Columbus, Ohio, has more than 7,000 customers worldwide.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2011-09-19/corporate-jets-face-100-per-flight-fee-in-obama-deficit-plan.html


35 posted on 09/20/2011 7:57:30 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Refuse to provide replacement parts...


40 posted on 09/21/2011 6:38:23 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama really has 0 foresight. How is he and Michelle going to get to all their fund raisers when out of office?


41 posted on 09/21/2011 6:40:45 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson