I didn’t mean to say that Petraeus is an incompetent General. He was a very effective General and understood we would not win a war of insurgency with conventional methods killing them all and letting God sort them out.
What I mean is that, Obama is implementing Soro’s agenda, and to do so means not putting the best men for the job in the jobs where they can be effective, but burying them where they can’t be effective, so he can work his communist schemes behind the scenes.
For example, Petraeus would have been perfect for the Joint Chiefs position, but instead Obama installs the much weaker and inferior Dempsey. He bury’s Petraeus at CIA, where Petraeus has absolutely no experience with US intelligence. And he puts Panetta in the Pentagon.
There were far better picks for each of these positions, if you REALLY wanted to fulfill the traditional pro-US missions these positions have performed. But that is not Obama’s communist agenda. So he takes great candidates suited for other roles and then puts them in the wrong place so they basically are out of his way, and he isn’t interfered with by someone stronger in that roll.
This is just like when he picked Hitlery for SOS to get rid of her. Puts her in a corner to keep her out of the way and prevent a strong SOS from stymieing him. That is what he did with Petraeus. That is what I was referring to.
Very good point!
I don’t know anything about Dempsey.
I’m certainly no fan of Panetta, but was it part of Soros’ plan for Clinton and he to go rogue and order the hit on Bin Laden against Obama and Jarrett’s orders? That’s worth something right there.
Petraeus has been the CG of a Division, a Major Army Command, and two theaters of war. I’m sure he can figure out the CIA.
I didn’t mean to say that Petraeus is an incompetent General. He was a very effective General and understood we would not win a war of insurgency with conventional methods killing them all and letting God sort them out.
What I mean is that, Obama is implementing Soro’s agenda, and to do so means not putting the best men for the job in the jobs where they can be effective, but burying them where they can’t be effective, so he can work his communist schemes behind the scenes.
For example, Petraeus would have been perfect for the Joint Chiefs position, but instead Obama installs the much weaker and inferior Dempsey. He bury’s Petraeus at CIA, where Petraeus has absolutely no experience with US intelligence. And he puts Panetta in the Pentagon.
There were far better picks for each of these positions, if you REALLY wanted to fulfill the traditional pro-US missions these positions have performed. But that is not Obama’s communist agenda. So he takes great candidates suited for other roles and then puts them in the wrong place so they basically are out of his way, and he isn’t interfered with by someone stronger in that roll.
This is just like when he picked Hitlery for SOS to get rid of her. Puts her in a corner to keep her out of the way and prevent a strong SOS from stymieing him.