[allmendream]

I support a standard of less government involvement in our lives as is consistent with our Constitution being one that outlines a government of LIMITED and ENUMERATED powers - where the people are sovereign and where the laws passed by their representatives must comport with individual liberty and the natural rights of all mankind.

As such I oppose most of the nannyState laws you seem to favor, other than the nannyState laws you oppose - not at all based upon an objective and logical standard - but all based upon ‘us’ and ‘them’.

That is obviously your illogical basis and standard - and rather than argue against the consistent and logical standard I support - you simply have to characterize me in your thinking and posts as ‘one of them’.

Rather idiotic and infantile and completely illogical.

[ansel12]

I’ll take that as a yes, you do support the libertarian gains by the homosexual agenda and their, forced by the courts, against community standards, penetration into our culture.