Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinanju
I predict Melson’s testimony will include many, “I can't recall(s)”,”not to my knowledge(s)”, “not that I'm aware of(s)” and “I cannot say(s)”.
5 posted on 07/01/2011 10:15:30 AM PDT by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: liberalh8ter

That brings back memories of the Klinton Follies of the nineties.

I believe the point is that you can only get away with that game if you’re appearing before an investigative panel that either is being run by your own party and wants to get you off, or it’s being run by milquetoast RINOs who might enjoy giving you a hard time but who don’t want have to man up and do something unpleasant that they’ll have to defend, like indicting you.

What happens if the guys running the subcommittee refuse to play ball?


6 posted on 07/01/2011 10:23:46 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: liberalh8ter

From Clear and Present danger:

The line you need to learn is, “I have no recollection of that, Senator.”


8 posted on 07/01/2011 10:32:26 AM PDT by NOVACPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson