She’s lied on her asylum application, lied on her taxes, lied to get subsidized housing, and launders money for drug dealers.
Whether she was raped or not, she’s not a credible witness. If she had a Scots jury, the best she could hope for was “not proven.”
BTW, how does a man without a weapon force oral sex on a fit young woman who has her teeth?
Rape is based upon the allegation, but the physical evinced must also support the allegation. All of the bull crap about she lied here etc is not admissible without the judge allows it then it can be crossed. And as to a weapon, I can kill you in a second with a letter opener are a pair of scissors.