Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry, Palin aren't running, just enjoying the ride
Beaumont Enterprise ^ | July 3, 2011 | Thomas Taschinger (I bet is a democrat)

Posted on 07/03/2011 7:57:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-176 next last
To: dalereed

It’s an editorial — and it is so designated at the top.


101 posted on 07/03/2011 11:04:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: secondamendmentkid

Some HAVE said that they would only vote for Palin. I will likely vote for any nominee, but I will always feel as if we blew our chance to elect the best if Sarah is not the nominee. And I will vote with a heavy heart. Bob


102 posted on 07/03/2011 11:07:38 AM PDT by alstewartfan (When you're fresh out of lawyers, you don't know how good it's gonna feel! Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: secondamendmentkid

Many are saying they will write her in if she does not get the nod.

If she runs and wins the nod I will devote 24 7 to help her get elected as ousting that disgusting commie wretch obama is of utmost importance to me.


103 posted on 07/03/2011 11:08:34 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: The flash mob who wonÂ’t leave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
What I said was the sentence the author of the story made about Paul was correct, the fact he was later captured had no bearing on the intent of his ride. And I made up no question about what she was ask, since her answer was gibberish, it makes no difference. But she was not ask about Paul Revere.

Speaking of gibberish which country are you from?

104 posted on 07/03/2011 11:14:19 AM PDT by Starstruck (Independence is the opposite of dependence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

It took me less than three minutes to find the full video...if you want to see it google it yourself.


105 posted on 07/03/2011 11:19:43 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
The answer was then turned incorrectly into a "gotcha".

____________________________________

It was Palin(™) herself who described it as a "gotcha question". And, there is no such thing as a "gotcha amswer".

106 posted on 07/03/2011 11:24:26 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

you provided the quote back it up with your link.


107 posted on 07/03/2011 11:25:11 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

Do it youself. I don’t owe you a thing.


108 posted on 07/03/2011 11:27:25 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

whatever. so i guess the link is one you don’t want to post for some reason most likely the website it is coming from. no skin off my nose you don’t want to prove what you say that’s up to you.


109 posted on 07/03/2011 11:37:30 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
A question was asked and then answered appropriately, although slightly disjointed. The answer was then turned incorrectly into a "gotcha".

It was Palin(™) herself who described it as a "gotcha question". And, there is no such thing as a "gotcha amswer".

You quote the phrase "gotcha answer" as if it came from my post. Don't do that. I didn't say that. I did use the the slang "gotcha". I did use the slang gotcha to describe what was done by some to an appropriate answer by Palin.

As I did say....

A question was asked and then answered appropriately, although slightly disjointed. The answer was then turned incorrectly into a "gotcha".

110 posted on 07/03/2011 11:45:30 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Bull, “the question ask was, what have you seen so far today, and what are you going to take away from you visit. “ it has been posted hundreds of times.


111 posted on 07/03/2011 11:56:50 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And the answer rinded me of this,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WALIARHHLII


112 posted on 07/03/2011 12:00:49 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Reminded, damn Droid.


113 posted on 07/03/2011 12:01:38 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

If you aren’t interested in the facts then don’t take the three minutes to find it for yourself...it’s all over the web. Don’t expect me to do your work.


114 posted on 07/03/2011 12:09:40 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

>>but she (Palin) is still a lightening rod among the general public.<<

Well, yes, that’s certainly the way the MSM has tried to condition us to think, but is it true? Or is it just one more fable created by the MSM? After all, Reagan was just an ill-informed, second-rate actor, with views way to the right of the general population at one time, according to that same MSM. Now that he’s gone, they’ve relaxed somewhat, but that was exactly how he was portrayed both before and after his election. And after he won re-election by a landslide, he was just a doddering old man with early stage Alzheimer’s, except that he was sharp enough to be fully complicit in the Iran-Contra dealings.

We’ll find out soon, I suspect, just how that “lightening rod” is perceived by the general public, and I have a feeling the MSM will once again be disappointed.

Now our current President on the other hand, there’s a lightning rod for negativity if ever I saw one, even to many of his presumed base at this point.


115 posted on 07/03/2011 12:10:26 PM PDT by Norseman (Term Limits: 8 years is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
A question was asked and then answered appropriately, although slightly disjointed.

Wouldn't it be fair to say Bachmann was as right about John Wayne as Palin was about Paul Revere?

Wayne's parents lived in Waterloo shortly before he was born. Revere warned the British but not with bells.

116 posted on 07/03/2011 12:13:17 PM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Bull, “the question ask was, what have you seen so far today, and what are you going to take away from you visit. “ it has been posted hundreds of times.

Unbelievable.

Of course it has been posted numerous times, and that includes several times by me. I've now said several times that Palin was asked what she is going to take away from her visit.

And I've responded now several times saying that the question obviously leads one to respond with new information one has learned from such a visit.

Which is extactly what Palin did.

Yes "bull", as in you are full of it

And BTW, the past tense of the verb "ask" is "asked". Nothing wrong with making mistakes, but you keep repeating yours.

117 posted on 07/03/2011 12:14:35 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Perry doubled the size of state government in 9 years.

What does a rainy day fund have to do with *doubling* the size of government?

118 posted on 07/03/2011 12:15:36 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RINOs suck

The choice will boil down to Romney and Perry. There won’t be any other choice in the end, in my opinion.


119 posted on 07/03/2011 12:19:38 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

>>If you ask a kid in school about Paul (Revere) and what he did, an improper answer would be he rode out to warn the British. I do not care what planet you are from, that is the fact.<<

No, but if you had just finished going through a historical presentation on his ride, for example, and you were asked what you learned, you’d sound pretty damned stupid saying “I learned that he rode out to warn that the British are coming.”

See how this works?


120 posted on 07/03/2011 12:20:33 PM PDT by Norseman (Term Limits: 8 years is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson