Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Fish gotta swim,
birds gotta fly, and
RATS gotta tax!

1 posted on 07/03/2011 3:36:02 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmithL

Amazon is not going to break the law. They have said they will stop doing the activity that is being taxed by dropping all of their affiliates.


2 posted on 07/03/2011 3:41:02 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Pubbies like their taxes too.


3 posted on 07/03/2011 3:45:05 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Following the law these days is passe as illustrated by the Bambi administration.......Democrats refuse to pay thier taxes, Bambi refuses to step down even though he can’t prove eligibility, Bambi refuses to ask Congress for approval gto war with Libya.............hey, it’s rotten from the head down. anyone who would comply with CA is insane


6 posted on 07/03/2011 3:51:04 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Amazon is in a trickier position in California than they have been before. I haven't read the law, but other articles state that it doesn't just apply to the main company and any sales associates, but to subsidiaries too. Amazon's subsidiaries (although I might have the exact business relationship wrong) like Internet Movie Database and and Lab126 (the maker of the Kindle) are based in California. This makes California's claims different than those from the Quill vs. North Dakota which outlawed interstate sales tax collection without a business nexus. Do IMDB and Lab126 give Amazon a business nexus in California? I don't really know, but Amazon's lawyers better be working overtime on this issue.
8 posted on 07/03/2011 4:00:14 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Tennessee is more than happy to take over California’s business burdens.


9 posted on 07/03/2011 4:02:54 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
On line sales taxes, if they could be collected, is a lot of money. Believe me with gov broke the thieves in D.C. will figure out how to get their "fair share".

Why should I pay state sales taxes on a purchase not made in my state? I go on-line and buy something from France or Japan why should I pay a state sales tax?

10 posted on 07/03/2011 4:03:37 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Board of Equalization

Comrade Mao approves

11 posted on 07/03/2011 4:04:41 PM PDT by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Califoria doesn’t need to secede from the Union. They are already a foreign country. Unrecognizable to us southerners. Ditto for NY.


13 posted on 07/03/2011 4:09:00 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

The San Francisco Chronicle, doing what it does best—lie. Amazon is not required to collect CA sales tax on items sold by Amazon.com. The law has to do with in-state affiliates, from whom Amazon has just disaffiliated itself.


16 posted on 07/03/2011 4:11:41 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrreaganaut

ping


27 posted on 07/03/2011 5:35:52 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

It was always meant to come down to a court fight. CA wants to make new law by saying that a retail company DOES have a physical presence in the state, even if that presence is a few guys in an office programming. They then want to use that presence in order to extend to the company the obligation to pay sales tax.


32 posted on 07/03/2011 6:13:23 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici ("Si, se gimme!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Don’t put it past the State Board of Equalization to come after residents for use taxes.


38 posted on 07/03/2011 7:35:19 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Pelosi: Obamacare indulgences for sale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I hate our greedy CA gov’t. If we could only cut pensions to the state unions, and stop donating to illegal aliens, we’d be a great state again.


44 posted on 07/03/2011 11:18:00 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 9: No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

Happy July 4th. Next case.


50 posted on 07/04/2011 2:51:44 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
If they can force this on Amazon (even though it is un constitutional) then Amazon should refuse to sell anything to anyone living in California.

There are probably millions of people that buy from Amazon in Calif, let them storm the Capitol with torches and pitchforks.

With plenty of hot tar and comfortable soft rainbow feathers.

56 posted on 07/04/2011 5:45:27 PM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

the times

Amazon planning 4th Indiana distribution center

By The Associated Press | Posted: Wednesday, July 6, 2011 7:00 am

PLAINFIELD, Ind. | Amazon.com is planning to open a fourth large distribution center in central Indiana.

The Seattle-based company announced Wednesday that its new warehouse in Plainfield would have hundreds of full-time and seasonal jobs, but didn’t give specifics or say when it would open. That follows Amazon’s announcement in May of a new distribution center near Indianapolis International Airport.

The Indianapolis Star and the Indianapolis Business Journal report the warehouse announcements come as the Internet retailer fights other states trying to collect taxes from its online sales. Indiana officials offered four years ago to not push the tax issue in recruiting Amazon to the state.

Amazon now has a distribution center just north of Indianapolis in Whitestown with 1,200 full-time workers and another in Plainfield that opened with 350 employees

http://www.nwitimes.com/news/state-and-regional/indiana/article_74a591cf-963a-579e-99ff-2c24a00e6f9f.html?print=1


59 posted on 07/06/2011 6:52:52 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson