To: Georgia Girl 2
The Constitution doesn’t mention anything about a president’s parents-—you can’t even find the word “parents” in this part of the document. So Bobby Jindal is qualified to be president, just like Barack Obama is if he was really born in Hawaii, because HE(Jindal) was born on U.S. soil. This makes sense. Why shouldn’t Jindal be qualified? He was born here, for crying out loud.
24 posted on
07/04/2011 1:05:37 AM PDT by
dupree
To: dupree
Why shouldn’t Jindal be qualified? He was born here, for crying out loud.
Ayman Al-Awlaki was born here too. Why shouldn't al-Awlaki be qualified?
Chinese women are currently paying $25,000 to vacation in the United States in order to have their children and then return to China. Under your less than enlightened view, these little sons of China would be eligible to be POTUS.
And of course anchor babies!
We could have some little member of MECHA as president some day. Someone who wants to return AZTLAN to Mexico.
Are you beginning to understand how absurd your position is?
26 posted on
07/04/2011 4:15:03 AM PDT by
Beckwith
(A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
To: dupree
I think its too complicated for you to understand. Enjoy your fourth of July holiday and have some watermelon. Deeper thinkers than you will resolve this dilema.
30 posted on
07/04/2011 6:33:13 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: dupree
Why shouldn’t Jindal be qualified? He was born here, for crying out loud. As an admirer of Gov. Jindal it would be great if we could apply his leadership "at the next level". But there are many qualified persons across this nation. But there is only one Constitution.
31 posted on
07/04/2011 6:53:25 AM PDT by
bluecat6
( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson