[Retired Greyhound]

Better that a guilty murderer walk free than an innocent person face guilt.

Casey probably did something, but it was very difficult to prove. The jury can only rule on facts in evidence, and within the guidelines of the law.

It’s a tough burden. Thank God for that, or else the State could easily imprison dissidents. Then nobody would be free.

[shooter223]

“She probably did it” is not good enough for a conviction.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>Better that a guilty murderer walk free than an innocent person face guilt.<<

I agree 100%. And I won’t go “round and round” about this, but I can’t get past the mountains of damning evidence, the lies, the fictitious nanny, the corpse hair in Casey’s car, etc.

There is NO reasonable doubt in my mind that a murderer walked.

Shame on the jury. IMHO.

[EDINVA]

The problem with this verdict (aside from setting free the woman I am convinced killed her own daughter) is that places like FL and LA will start to become wonderful body dumping grounds. All the murderer will have to do is leave their slain victim in the swamp long enough for all evidence to be taken care of by nature.

[Colofornian]

Better that a guilty murderer walk free than an innocent person face guilt.

What innocent person are you talking about here again?