It may have been a loss for that poor baby, but it was a win for the Constitution where the state has to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Well said.
Caylee is in heaven. Jesus has her. God will ultimately judge Casey if she is indeed guilty.
There is MORE than sufficient evidence here. A fictional nanny? No concern about the location of her child? Remnants of a dead body in a car no one else had access to? Likely not sufficient for Murder1, but it is the only logical conclusion. Logic is no longer welcome in American courts apparently. as another poster commented, reasonable doubt has a massively different meaning in the past 30 years. It is a concept perverted by trial lawyers.
“It may have been a loss for that poor baby, but it was a win for the Constitution where the state has to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Actually the state did prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The problem was, the jury was brain-dead; a consequence of attending public schools.
You got that right FRiend.