After all, if legalizing same-sex marriage is like making interracial marriage legal (an argument often made but which i strongly disagree with), then isn't “Brides” magazine a little like having “White couples” magazine?
no, I'm not making the argument at all - but they will. All after saying that same-sex marriage won't affect anyone else.
That I don’t want weeds in my lawn does not mean I am scared of dandelions.
The sooner folks start looking to their faith to define and protect marriage the better off the institution will be. Many have been conditioned to think that marriage comes from the state, so they accept whatever the state says is marriage, even impossibilities like “gay marriage”. Statists and homosexualists love that, and they really love that the state has the power to punish if one doesn’t accept their ever devolving take on marriage.
Freegards
“If the state can redefine marriage and enforce that redefinition, it can do so with the doctor-patient relationship, the lawyer-client relationship, the parent-child relationship, the confessor-penitent relationship, and virtually every other relationship that is woven into the texture of civil society. In doing so, the state does serious damage to the democratic project. Concurrently, it reduces what it tries to substitute for reality to farce.”
This above statement from the article is the crux of the problem we face. The fascist homosexual left-wing do not even want for people to have a right to representation on the state definition of marriage. They want the voice of those who oppose homosexuality outlawed as hate speech even. So if we are denied a right to representation on the issue of how marriage is defined then on what basis will we maintain this right on other issues such as the ‘age of consent’, polygamy and any issue dealing with sexuality or public definitions of decency?
The word ‘homophobic’ is a made up word meant to smear those who oppose homosexuality. The word first appeared in ‘Screw’ magazine back around 1970. It has no basis as a real word at all and is meaningless except for being used as a smear against anyone who doesn’t march lockstep with the fascist homosexual agenda.
People had better start to stand up strongly against this fascist movement or we will lose more of our rights on issues that deal with child safety in public and on issues of public decency. If we do not fight and simply allow this fascist movement full access to our children in public schools then we will see a new generation become even more corrupted then the children corrupted by the sixties counter culture, much worse. Every human being is corruptible, children especially so.
Ping
That some sexual perversions instill revulsion is not "phobic" prejudice. It's human nature.
Bump
Placemark.
Cultural suicide ping!