Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jh4freedom

Sorry, but you seem to be drifting pretty far from your original argument. If the judge “must accept all of the plaintiffs allegations as true,” then it makes even less sense for Obama to NOT submit a legal birth certificate as evidence in an MTD.


132 posted on 07/09/2011 10:06:07 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

Sorry, but you seem to be drifting pretty far from your original argument. If the judge “must accept all of the plaintiffs allegations as true,” then it makes even less sense for Obama to NOT submit a legal birth certificate as evidence in an MTD.


Far afield? We’re still discussing motions to dismiss on standing grounds, aren’t we?
It would be redundant to submit any defense evidence on a motion to dismiss on standing grounds. The judge is already viewing the lawsuit from the legal perspective of the plaintiff.
In any event, the proof is in the pudding...failure to submit a birth certificate has not cost Zero or any other defendant in Zero eligibility lawsuits. They’ve all been dismissed without a birth certificate whether Zero was a defendant or not.


133 posted on 07/09/2011 11:36:00 AM PDT by jh4freedom (Mr. "O" has got to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson