I’m a social conservative. I’m looking for the candidate who can win, and I’m not convinced that Bachmann is that candidate.
That said, if she were the nominee, I would vote for her.
I prefer Perry or Palin, neither of whom is running.
Yet.
I’m a social conservative. I’m looking for the candidate who can win, and I’m not convinced that Bachmann is that candidate.
I am convinced she is our worst candidate (other than Romney and the soon to be departed Gingrich), there are better ones that have declared already, and I would be surprised if neither Perry nor Palin jump in.
That said, if she were the nominee, I would vote for her.
I totally agree. I just hope it doesn't come to that.
I think the article is explaining why so many so cons are holding back, they are waiting for a better alternative than Bachmann. She has been great as a congresscritter, but congresscritters simply are bad candidates for a number of reasons.
“I’m a social conservative. I’m looking for the candidate who can win, and I’m not convinced that Bachmann is that candidate.
That said, if she were the nominee, I would vote for her.
I prefer Perry or Palin, neither of whom is running.”
This pretty well sums up my position.
I would also throw Herman Cain in the category of a candidate I’m not convinced would win, but I would definitely vote for if he’s the nominee. Oh wait, I guess that makes me a racist too...