Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann Stands By Marriage Pact That Links Slavery to Black Family Values
Fox News ^ | July 9, 2011 | Stephen Clark

Posted on 07/09/2011 10:06:40 AM PDT by ejdrapes

Bachmann Stands By Marriage Pact That Links Slavery to Black Family Values
By Stephen Clark
Published July 09, 2011

Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann is standing firm behind a pledge she signed Thursday that promotes marriage and social conservative values, but includes a passage that suggests black families were in better shape during slavery.

The Family Leader, an Iowa-based conservative group led by Bob Vander Plaats, issued the pledge formally called, "The Marriage Vow – A Declaration of Dependence Upon Marriage and Family."

The two page document condemns gay marriage, abortion, pornography and infidelity. But perhaps the most controversial part is found in the preamble where the state of the black family in the slave era is compared to today.

"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American President," the document reads.

Click here to read the document.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bachmann; bachmann4obama; fascism; marriagevow; slavery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last
"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American President," the document reads.

Can someone tell me what is inaccurate in this statement?

1 posted on 07/09/2011 10:06:43 AM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Nothing inaccurate at all, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a stupid thing for a Presidential candidate to sign.


2 posted on 07/09/2011 10:11:37 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

It’s inaccurate because it’s not politically correct.

Other than that, it’s a 2” grouping at 1000 yards.


3 posted on 07/09/2011 10:11:40 AM PDT by wastedyears (SEAL SIX makes me proud to have been playing SOCOM since 2003.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Slaves were treated as cattle in the old South.

When it was advantageous to the owner he would allow families to stay together. When not, he would split them for whatever reason. It's the basis of innumerable Blues songs from the old days.

However, that Bachmann would sign a pledge with such statements shows she is as stupid as she appears. And, oblivious.

That said, there are at least 5 million that will vote for her on the basis of this pledge alone.

4 posted on 07/09/2011 10:12:37 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Fox leftist News strikes again.

Roger Aile's should be ashamed that he allows leftists peddle Soros funded Think Progress crap in his website !

Fox is full of lefties and a majority of the staff are Manhattan libs .

5 posted on 07/09/2011 10:12:37 AM PDT by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

I do not think they should have included that statement at all. They could have kept the part about illegitimate births skyrocketing after LBJ; but the piranhas in the MSM are going to characterize the document as pro-slavery.


6 posted on 07/09/2011 10:13:13 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

If it’s true, it’s not racist. Bachman is free to use that if she wants.


7 posted on 07/09/2011 10:14:22 AM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

In the late 1800’s, early 1900’s, black were most likely to be Bible believing Southern Baptists.


8 posted on 07/09/2011 10:14:49 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

It’s the implication that people are better off as slaves that makes this disgusting. There is no need to add this. Why not go after LBJ’s socialist policies towards poverty?


9 posted on 07/09/2011 10:15:01 AM PDT by ABQHispConservative (There are still some rinos left for 2012. Let's get them and the fake tea partiers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
Exactly. She and her crew will be spending all their time with, "Well, what I meant to say was...."
10 posted on 07/09/2011 10:15:32 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
That said, there are at least 5 million that will vote for her on the basis of this pledge alone.

That's because it's accurate. Conservatives are big on the truth.

11 posted on 07/09/2011 10:16:34 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

When the Irish first came to the U.S. (famine), they were treated worse than the slaves. Strange that no one talks about it much.


12 posted on 07/09/2011 10:17:20 AM PDT by PDGearhead (Obama's lack of citizenship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Of all the ways the point could have been made, that was the worst possible.


13 posted on 07/09/2011 10:18:00 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative
It’s the implication that people are better off as slaves that makes this disgusting.

The truth, as outlined in the pledge, is that they were more likely to be in a two parent family during slavery than today.

You obviously want to read more into it than is there.

Your freedom to do so, but it's simply a reflection on your need to be offended.

14 posted on 07/09/2011 10:20:20 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Statement of fact.

No brainer.

Why can’t a candidate sign a statement?

Oh I see, we are soo soo scared of what “liberals will think about us” still that we should never sign on to a statement of objective truth.

/sarc off


15 posted on 07/09/2011 10:20:29 AM PDT by NYCslicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American President

Can someone tell me what is inaccurate in this statement?

Well, it was American slavery, versus that in the Caribbean and Brazil, that fostered stable family units among slaves. It was this, among other things, that was principally responsible for American slavery to have been a relatively minor participant in the importation of slaves compared to the Caribbean and Brazil. Though the same thing could be said about black children for almost any time in U.S. history up to about the 1970s.
16 posted on 07/09/2011 10:20:49 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Michelle Bachmann isn’t running for “First Historian of The United States’’ for cryin’ out loud! She’s running for President. What’s with all the history quizzes? MR ‘’57’’ states’’ wouldn’t know anything about the history of America or the world for that matter if it ran up and bit him on the ass. He proves that everyday.


17 posted on 07/09/2011 10:21:33 AM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
"That's because it's accurate. Conservatives are big on the truth. "

You can't substantiate that by citing a single reference. And to allude that blacks were better off, in any way, under slavery...borders on racism, at least.

18 posted on 07/09/2011 10:21:33 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

See #14


19 posted on 07/09/2011 10:22:39 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PDGearhead
"When the Irish first came to the U.S. (famine), they were treated worse than the slaves. Strange that no one talks about it much."

BS!!!!!!!!!

The Irish had freedom of association and every freedom you enjoy today.

They were free to move out of the cities and settle land in order to enjoy the fruits of their labors and LIBERTY.

20 posted on 07/09/2011 10:24:03 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson