Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some union members pleased with Walker's changes
Wisconsin State Journal ^ | Monday, July 11, 2011 4:30 am | STEVEN VERBURG

Posted on 07/11/2011 5:59:32 AM PDT by Hunton Peck

Susan Flood says she will gladly subtract $4,000 in pension and health premiums from her take-home pay next year in exchange for not having to pay roughly $800 in union dues.

Few of her fellow teachers at Brookwood Elementary School in the Genoa City District share her view of Wisconsin's new public sector labor law, which soon will affect the paychecks of thousands of public employees, Flood said.

But she is a Republican who has been required for 19 years to pay dues to a union she views as promoting mediocrity and high taxes. So when the law stripped public employees of most union rights this year, she celebrated.

"They say the union is there to stand up for you," Flood said. "Well, no one has ever had to stand up for me. I think I stand up for myself by doing my job."

Unions are hoping people like Flood are a small minority of their members, now that the law no longer allows automatic payroll deductions for government workers' union dues. Instead, they're counting on members to continue supporting the unions by authorizing voluntary bank drafts to cover dues.

Rick Badger, executive director of AFSCME Council 40, which represents 32,000 local government workers in the state outside Milwaukee County, was upbeat about the union's prospects but acknowledged there's no way to know how many workers will ante up.

"It's important that we get that participation," Badger said. "That's going to sustain the union for what may be a couple years until we can change this thing."

Paulette Feld, president of the Wisconsin State Employees Union, said she expected dues signup efforts to pick up after this summer's recall elections. Union leaders are focused on trying to remove six Republican state senators who supported the collective bargaining law while defending three Democrats who fled the state to delay a vote on the measure.

Some lower-wage workers will have a hard time paying dues, and others will say no for political reasons, Feld said, "but people I run into have been saying to me that they are going to be getting their information in."

Money in their pocket?

When he introduced his plan to dramatically roll back collective bargaining for public employees, Gov. Scott Walker said the plan would have the support of many union members, who had no say under the old rules on whether their dues would be automatically deducted.

"That school teacher now will no longer have to pay a thousand dollars taken out of their paycheck," Walker told the Wisconsin Radio Network in March. "That's money that they can use to pay for health care and other things like that."

But those savings will be more than offset by the higher contributions now required of employees for their pensions and health care premiums. The law also requires annual union recertification votes and forbids collective bargaining on things such as vacations, sick pay, seniority preferences, overtime and grievance procedures.

The State Journal contacted Walker's office and several Republican state legislators for names of public workers willing to talk about their support for the GOP-backed union law, but few came forward.

Sen. Glenn Grothman, R-West Bend, said he has spoken to prison guards and teachers who have thanked him for helping pass Act 10, but they won't go public because they fear disapproval or harassment from co-workers who fought bitterly to defeat the bill.

Not everyone feels intimidated.

Kristi Lacroix is a Kenosha teacher who has been openly critical of her union for years. Recently, with the help of the National Right to Work Legal Foundation and other conservative groups, she filed a brief in federal court supporting the Wisconsin labor law against a union lawsuit.

Lacroix said she was nervous, but nobody gave her a hard time. She remains friends with her local union president and said she thinks Mary Bell, president of the Wisconsin Education Association Council, is "awesome."

She acknowledged that union contracts have boosted her standard of living, but she is a Republican who agrees with Walker that the new law is needed to control government costs, even if it reduces her pay.

"Does it stink? Yes, but I'm a taxpayer, too," Lacroix said.

Satisfaction is key

About 4,000 local government workers and teachers in about half of the state's teacher unions will begin to see the effects of the new law in their paychecks this month. Some 22,000 state workers without contracts will notice the changes beginning with their Aug. 25 paychecks. Members of other school and municipal unions will be affected as their contracts expire.

Whether they opt to continue representation will likely depend on two factors, said Jack Fiorito, a Florida State University business professor who specializes in research on member attitudes toward their unions: a feeling they have some say in the organization, and a belief that the union can make a difference in significant matters.

"What I think a lot of those unhappy members may discover, however, is that while public sector unions have limited power, they will be even less influential if workers do not support them," Fiorito said.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: budgetrepair; collectivebargaining; union; unions; wisconsinshowdown

1 posted on 07/11/2011 5:59:36 AM PDT by Hunton Peck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Ping!


2 posted on 07/11/2011 6:07:08 AM PDT by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

“They say the union is there to stand up for you,” Flood said. “Well, no one has ever had to stand up for me. I think I stand up for myself by doing my job.”

Exactly.


3 posted on 07/11/2011 6:07:34 AM PDT by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

The way this is worded it sounds like it is an either/or situation which is untrue. The woman is not giving up $4000 in exchange for $800 less in Union Dues.

Every union member is now having to pay $4000 more into their pension and health care plans and now have a choice of either paying the $800 to the union or not. $800 is a lot of money to a lot of people so I think the unions in Wisconsin will be a lot poorer and that $800 from each union member will be put back into the economy not the Democrates political machine.


4 posted on 07/11/2011 6:21:58 AM PDT by when the time is right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: when the time is right

hat might be her deduction for health and pension premiums. It would mean that they are very expensive programs to start with but it is possible. I have more than that taken from my check for those items.


5 posted on 07/11/2011 6:42:01 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

The power of the teacher's union will only be reduced to the level of its perceived benefit. Individuals can, and will, support it with their dollars. However, these dollars are now "free will" dollars and not forcibly taken. Naturally contributions will decline because, frankly, the union has zero benefit to those who excel in their positions. Their jobs are safe and they will be sought after and rewarded. The dollars they add to the system are wasted. The mediocre teachers, on the other hand, have a higher perceived value to union protection, and they will continue to fund it for their benefit. But, as I hope, the power of the union will be reduced to a fitting level accordingly.


6 posted on 07/11/2011 6:43:33 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mom4melody

>“They say the union is there to stand up for you,” Flood said. “Well, no one has ever had to stand up for me. I think I stand up for myself by doing my job.”<

That’s why conservatives are logical and sane people. We get it. I was part of unions from high school onward and the only good thing unions are good at is subtracting what they want from my paycheck and not being there when I needed help.


7 posted on 07/11/2011 7:40:52 AM PDT by max americana (FUBO NATION 2012 FAK BARAK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: max americana
Call me brilliant! I figured out the union scam in 1970, the first year I taught.

Also call me a right wing conservative, if you're a lib..

vaudine

8 posted on 07/11/2011 8:03:07 AM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: when the time is right

I think within 2 years you’ll have less than 50% of teachers paying dues..


9 posted on 07/11/2011 8:49:50 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the earth..it's the ONLY planet with CHOCOLATE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson