Not the Amish

[LightningStriker2010]

I realize that. BUT in instances where video is available, there is still an outcry to emphasize race. Even when no video is available, the outcry is due to the desire to rile up whites moreso than to get a complete description of the attackers. I have seen people angry at a non-reporting of race even though the perps had be apprehended. Can you give a practical reason for their race to be reported under those circumstances?

One of the things that stands out to me is when Van Jones stated that it is overwhelmingly white males who go into schools or other public places and randomly begin shooting strangers, this site went into an uproar. Thus, such a double standard gives me the impression that white advocacy is a strong theme here. The problem is that blacks tend to not want to join a group that practices white advocacy.

[Amberdawn]

White advocacy? When the media and government constantly emphasize hate crimes legislation, is it so hard to understand that whites expect to be included? The Left practices double standards, while we expect all to be held to only one standard. When these attacks happen, it is assumed that race plays no role in the perpetrators actions, and most of us here beg to differ, given the comments made to the victims during the assaults. Besides which, if no one is standing up for one’s rights, one must do so themselves. If that’s “white advocacy”, then SO BE IT.