Paul could be counted on to foster Constitutionally-consistent policies even when the specific outcome was unpopular. That kind of principle, and ideological consistency, is sorely lacking in a place too often governed by ‘grand bargains,’ and ‘across the aisle’ partnerships that always resort in an expansion of federal power. I didn’t always agree with Paul, but I very much liked him being in D.C.; I for one will miss his voice.
I agree.
As I further from the pulican party, the more sense he makes. I am getting more and more small l libertarian.
...and I with you.