My record is not compiled from the original, it is a copy of the original document, and it's easy to tell that by the scratches and artifacts on the record--something missing from Obama's that seems suspicious. Why is his copy so clean looking? My file number is completely uniform and begins with 57-. His, with the duplicate ending 1 cannot be genuine.
A few people have mentioned the kerning problem with Obama's document, which, I agree, is not typical with a typewriter. However, on my document, some pairs of letters do not have uniform spacing, for example, the "rn" in California are running into each other. I don't believe the appearance of kerning is evidence of a forgery.
The left alignment of typed words on my COLB is not uniform running down the document. These are all over the map and don't even appear to be caused by using a tab key.
An uppercase "A" in my mother's first name was struck out (leaving a little shadow) and then retyped, leaving it slightly higher than the following letters. The capital "A" in my father's middle name is normal.
All instances of a lower case "l" are faded at the top. That could be from the ribbon, the finger pressure applied or from dirt on the key.
After scanning both to PDF and TIF, there are no layers. The PDF has no OCR Suspects as it is renderable text.
Running "examine document" on the PDF, this is the result. So there are some parts of the document that render as "hidden" and that seems like a layer, but it isn't. What is also strange is that the file number is perfect on the document, but in this image there is something between the 5 and the 6 that you cannot see otherwise. My point is that scanning to PDF does cause things to appear and disappear. But the identical check boxes alone are enough to convince me that the WH released document is a forgery!
