“the underlying layer of the security paper that was not a part of the original scan. They introduced that green “security” paper into the document.”
Yes it was, and no they didn’t. Not unless they went through the green layer and erased the green around all the words. Which is a really silly way to forge a document.
“As you adjust the first layer to be more translucent, the bottom layer that is the security pattern mated to the PDF document will then distort the upper layer , randomly...
You can’t modify the document to prove the boxes are unique. That is creating distortions between layers.”
I didn’t modify anything. I just blew it up really big. I’d planned to make an animated gif alternating between the two, hence the opacity comment, but I didn’t go with that.
“Trust me , we landed on the moon.”
Absolutely. But there are still a lot of people who refuse to believe historical events from decades ago. Instead, they fall back on government conspiracies, faked images, massive-coverups, etc.
And then there are the folks who don’t believe we landed on the moon.
I hadn't wanted to get into this silly argument, but i'm getting a little tired of your attitude. Explain Bit depth and pixel size in this image if you have a clue what you are talking about. Then explain how such an image can be created other than by incompetent pasting from different file formats.
This one image shows you everything you need to know to conclude the document is a paste up. You just have to have sufficient knowledge of the machine level aspect of computer graphics.