Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpdiii
Actually smoking reduces total health care costs.

I would be interested in where the data is for this statement. Not doubting it, and I have heard it said more than once on FR. But I would like the science behind said statement.

Pretty Please.

19 posted on 07/13/2011 10:15:37 PM PDT by LowOiL ("Abomination" sure sounds like "ObamaNation" to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: LowOiL

Here’s one recent blog on the health care costs for smokers and non-smokers.

http://ckmurray.blogspot.com/2011/06/smoking-decreases-health-costs-to.html

There’s studies and research out there for the costs of smokers versus non - you just have to dig for it - the media PR against smoking is the white noise that covers them.

Also, smokers who buy a pack a day pay $368 per year in federal taxes towards funding the SCHIP program...this is on top of state taxes that go towards health care...and roads....and salaries.

The non-smoker is a heavier burden on the health care system and all government systems in general.

‘Buy a Pack today Comrade’


21 posted on 07/14/2011 10:36:25 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Agenda21: Dept. of Life, Dept. of Liberty and the Dept. of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: LowOiL

Follow the link to the article about health care costs for smokers and non smokers.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-04-08-fda-tobacco-costs_N.htm


22 posted on 07/14/2011 1:02:36 PM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson