Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fla. lawsuit: Can doctors ask patients about guns?
Associated Press ^ | Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:13 PM EDT | CURT ANDERSON AP Legal Affairs Writer

Posted on 07/13/2011 9:35:44 PM PDT by Hunton Peck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: unkus

>”BTW, I lost all my guns in a boating accident.”<

‘Boating accidents’ seem to be increasing at an alarming rate (based on what I read here at FR).

Perhaps the nosey doctors should start asking if their patients own a boat to their invasive forms? It appears that boating accidents are actually more dangerous than guns.


41 posted on 07/14/2011 3:31:00 AM PDT by panaxanax (0bama >>WORST PRESIDENT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Doctors kill more people than guns. Good article.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2005/tabor010405.htm


42 posted on 07/14/2011 3:43:25 AM PDT by panaxanax (0bama >>WORST PRESIDENT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

Down load and print this form and carry it with you in case your doctor asks about guns

http://thefiringline.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-70697.html

FIREARMS SAFETY COUNSELING REPRESENTATION:
PHYSICIAN QUALIFICATIONS AND LIABILITY
Part One: Qualifications
I affirm that I am certified to offer (Name of Patient: ), herineafter referred to as “the Patient”, qualified advice about firearms safety in the home, having received:

Specify Course(s) of Study: _____________________________________________________________
from:
Specify Institution(s) __________________________________________________________________
on:
Specify Course Completion Date(s): ______________________________________________________
resulting in:
Specify Accreditation(s), Certification(s), License(s) etc.: _______________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________
Check one, as appropriate:
___ I represent that I have reviewed applicable scientific literature pertaining to defensive gun use and beneficial results of private firearms ownership. I further represent that I have reviewed all other relevant home safety issues with the Patient, including those relating to electricity, drains, disposals, compactors, garage doors, driveway safety, pool safety, pool fence codes and special locks for pool gates, auto safety, gas, broken glass, stored cleaning chemicals, buckets, toilets, sharp objects, garden tools, home tools, power tools, lawnmowers, lawn chemicals, scissors, needles, forks, knives, etc. I also acknowledge, by receiving this document, I have been made aware that, in his inaugural address before the American Medical Association on June 20, 2001, new president Richard Corlin, MD, admitted “What we don’t know about violence and guns is literally killing us...researchers do not have the data to tell how kids get guns, if trigger locks work, what the warning signs of violence in schools and at the workplace are and other critical questions due to lack of research funding.” (UPI). In spite of this admission, I represent that I have sufficient data and expertise to provide expert and clinically sound advice to patients regarding firearms in the home.
OR
___ I am knowingly engaging in Home/Firearms Safety Counseling without certification, license or formal training in Risk Management, and; I have not reviewed applicable scientific literature pertaining to defensive gun use and beneficial results of private firearms ownership.
Part Two: Liability
I have determined, from a review of my medical malpractice insurance, that if I engage in an activity for which I am not certified, such as Firearms Safety Counseling, the carrier (check one, as appropriate):
___ will
___ will not
cover lawsuits resulting from neglect, lack of qualification, etc.

Insurance Carrier name, address and policy number insuring me for firearms safety expertise:

____________________________________________________________________________________

I further warrant that, should the Patient follow my firearm safety counseling and remove from the home and/or disable firearms with trigger locks or other mechanisms, and if the patient or a family member, friend or visitor is subsequently injured or killed as a result of said removal or disabling, that my malpractice insurance and/or personal assets will cover all actual and punitive damages resulting from a lawsuit initiated by the patient, the patient’s legal reprerentative, or the patient’s survivors.

Signature of attesting physician and date: ___________________________________________________

Name of attesting physician (please print):__________________________________________________

Signature of patient and date: ____________________________________________________________

Name of patient (please print):____________________________________________________________

Note to patient: Indicate if physician “REFUSED TO SIGN.” Ask physician to place copy in chart/medical record.


43 posted on 07/14/2011 3:48:33 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

“Point taken. “None of your damn business” is as good as “yes”. Which makes this an “ask me no questions, I’ll tell you no lies” scenario. I’m lying before I tell anyone what I’m holding.”

Exactly...we’re told not to lie. I tell my kids that there are times when lying makes PERFECT sense and you simply must do it. This is clearly one of those cases. I’ve also reached the point where I new lie when someone demands a Social Security number, but I know full-well that they will not be using it for anything...in those cases I make a ‘typo’ (whoops). Same for phone numbers...whoops and old phone number, I guess I got confused.


44 posted on 07/14/2011 4:47:55 AM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

I’d like to know what actual training and expertise doctors have on the public health costs and benefits to guns, other than some political indoctrination from the leftist JAMA.


45 posted on 07/14/2011 6:19:51 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

It’s more like 120 or 130 thousand a year now.


46 posted on 07/14/2011 6:22:28 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

I have a brother who is a pediatric alergy/asthma doctor. He’s the senior partner of the practice and none of the other 24 doctors never ask the parents about guns. They’re not emergency room doctors, as my brother says. Any suspected child abuse they see is handled appropriately.


47 posted on 07/14/2011 7:43:02 AM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JLLH

This is about creating a DE FACTO REGISTRATION.

Doctors will ask and then enter the answer in their computer records.

Thanks to GE big brother intrusive data centralization will give Obamacare full ability to look at the registration list. (for those who have not seen the creepy commecial GE is touting the centralized big brother medical database they have.)

If these doctor’s were serious they would hand a pamphlet to everyone, and not bother finding out who has what. Doctors don’t ask for a house cleaner inventory they just warn and move on.

This has NOTHING to do with medical care, this has everything to do with creating a registration list.


48 posted on 07/14/2011 7:52:35 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

These are the same doctors who were rooting for the communists by opposing nuclear weapons.

I believe the judge voted against a preliminary injuction. Anybody know the judge?


49 posted on 07/14/2011 7:55:31 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson