Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
Failure to investigate the first crime, does not make investigating the second crime wrong.

But it does prove political motivation for the second prosecution, doesn't it? Which is what this is all about.

32 posted on 07/14/2011 1:58:54 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: abb
But it does prove political motivation for the second prosecution, doesn't it? Which is what this is all about.

Cry me a river. If conservatives need Fox to survive, they're even more screwed than they know.

37 posted on 07/14/2011 2:12:54 PM PDT by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: abb
"But it does prove political motivation for the second prosecution, doesn't it? Which is what this is all about. "

No it doesn't, it might prove political favoritism for overlooking the first offense. You need a lot more cases of non-prosecution of phone hacking to be able to claim this is selective prosecution.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

38 posted on 07/14/2011 2:13:01 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson