But it does prove political motivation for the second prosecution, doesn't it? Which is what this is all about.
Cry me a river. If conservatives need Fox to survive, they're even more screwed than they know.
No it doesn't, it might prove political favoritism for overlooking the first offense. You need a lot more cases of non-prosecution of phone hacking to be able to claim this is selective prosecution.
Two wrongs don't make a right.