Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel-Iran War in September?
The Economic Policy Journal ^ | 7-17-2011 | Robert Wenzel

Posted on 07/17/2011 3:04:30 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 07/17/2011 3:04:36 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

So with Obama in the White House,are we going to be backing the Iranians?


2 posted on 07/17/2011 3:09:34 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Interesting... but mot surprising. It’s amazing it hasn’t gone down already.


3 posted on 07/17/2011 3:10:28 PM PDT by CurlyBill (1-20-13 can't get here fast enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
So with Obama in the White House,are we going to be backing the Iranians?

Sadly, this is a legitimate question right now...

4 posted on 07/17/2011 3:12:08 PM PDT by CurlyBill (1-20-13 can't get here fast enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

With his poll numbers tanking and his expected donations to date at only 38%, do we see a wag the dog situation forming up? Most certainly it isn’t because it is the right thing to do.


5 posted on 07/17/2011 3:13:13 PM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
>"are we going to be backing the Iranians?"

Haven't we been since the 70s Carter days, and ever since?

What did we do about it then? Reagan? B1 B2 Billy Jeff & Bridezilla, and now the obvious current.


We should have nuked em then!

Emmyfurs declared WAR on us and we just kept on SLEEPING.

6 posted on 07/17/2011 3:14:43 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CurlyBill

If he were backing the Iranians, wouldn’t the bulk be in the Med? The only considrable reason to be in the Gulf if he were backing the Iraninans would be to protect them.


7 posted on 07/17/2011 3:15:43 PM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

“Israel-Iran War in September?”

If I had a nickel for everytime this was supposed to have happened.....


8 posted on 07/17/2011 3:19:40 PM PDT by Grunthor (Faster than the speed of smell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

“he only considrable reason to be in the Gulf if he were backing the Iraninans would be to protect them.”

This isn’t so far fetched!

Anyone else moving into that neighborhood? China, Russia, etc.?


9 posted on 07/17/2011 3:20:16 PM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
With current deployments holding stable, I would only get interested if the Eisenhower, Vinson and Stennis suddenly deployed. They would be needed to back-fill power projection in other areas of the world while 3 Carriers sustained operations in the Gulf region.

That said, we will not initiate a real battle while we have a Carrier in the Gulf.

It's silly to even sail them up that canal.

10 posted on 07/17/2011 3:21:42 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor

gator navy ping


11 posted on 07/17/2011 3:31:55 PM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
At around 0300 (Persian Gulf time) 17 January, along with a blitz by more than 100 TLAMs, wave after wave of coalition aircraft --including those flown by Navy and Marine pilots -- began hammering strategic targets inside both Iraq and Kuwait, signaling the start of offensive combat operations.

Throughout the war, air strikes were conducted from six aircraft carriers operating in the Red Sea and Persian Gulf.

USS America (CV 66) and USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) departed Norfolk 28 December 1990, and arrived just in time for the beginning of DESERT STORM. They joined USS Midway (CV 41), USS Saratoga (CV 60), USS John F. Kennedy (CV 67) and USS Ranger (CV 61) who were already on station.

http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ds5.htm

12 posted on 07/17/2011 3:36:39 PM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam

Someone just posted the other day that Iran was moving 20,000 government workers from the capitol, to outlying cities to decentralized. Sounds like war plans to me.


13 posted on 07/17/2011 3:47:58 PM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
and it will probably be in September before the vote on a Palestinian state

Wouldn't that be a sure-fire way of guaranteeing international support for a Palestinian state?

14 posted on 07/17/2011 3:53:31 PM PDT by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camerongood210

I don’t think so. I went out to ticket master and tickets for the war aren’t on sale yet.


15 posted on 07/17/2011 3:59:17 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (As long as the MSM covers for Obama, he will be above the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"That said, we will not initiate a real battle while we have a Carrier in the Gulf."

"It's silly to even sail them up that canal."

My opinion too.

16 posted on 07/17/2011 4:02:31 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
ship has just weighed anchor right next to Libya: this is odd since the coast of Tripoli had been left unattended for many weeks by US attack ships

It says first that the ship has "weighed anchor" next to Lybia, then indicates with the next sentence that there have been no ships stationed there before this. If that vessel weighed anchor then it has been there already and is pulling its anchor up to leave. Perhaps the authors are trying to throw in some nautical terms they have heard but think that their meanings don't matter?

17 posted on 07/17/2011 4:06:45 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

It would not surprise me if the US gave Israel the okay then shot down the Israeli aircraft. That would probably solve the whole MidEast mess in the eyes of our Moslem president.


18 posted on 07/17/2011 4:08:36 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Actually we converged major assets in the area several times in the Bush years and nothing happened. We marched our troops forthrightly up the hill then marched them down again. And again. We really really mean it this time, really!


19 posted on 07/17/2011 4:11:43 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

Any time such an attack is projected for the future I know it will not happen. I will believe it when the news reader says “Iran Four Hours Ago!”


20 posted on 07/17/2011 4:14:25 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson