[RonDog]

The imdb.com web page for The Undefeated is being bombed by libs trashing the movie. It needs help. See:

imdb votes page and imdb Undefeated page

To vote, you need to register with imdb.

Great minds think alike!

I just registered to post on IMDB -- a minor nuisance, but WORTH it!

And, I will post here the RESULTS of my FReeping there -- soon...

The imdb.com web page for The Undefeated is being bombed by libs trashing the movie. It needs help. See:

imdb votes page and imdb Undefeated page

To vote, you need to register with imdb.

[RonDog]

I just registered to post on IMDB -- a minor nuisance, but WORTH it!

And, I will post here the RESULTS of my FReeping there -- soon...

O.K.

I just rated the film -- TEN STARS!

Then, I posted MY review.

And, finally, I went through the current reviews...

...and clicked "helpful" for the GOOD ones, and "not helpful" for the BAD ones.

Here is where we stand right now:

Users: 1.5/10 (247 votes) 33 reviews | Critics: 16 reviews Metascore: 34/100 (based on 7 reviews from Metacritic.com)

It apparently may take 24 hours for the results of my FReeping to appear.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

Thing is most of our people don’t vote on web polls about films unless we’ve seen them. Not so for the left. So these numbers are useless.

[T Ruth]

Great minds think alike! I just registered to post on IMDB -- a minor nuisance, but WORTH it! And, I will post here the RESULTS of my FReeping there -- soon...

I should mention that based on my observations, a "9" vote will move the average up more than a "10" vote. This is because of the algorithm imdb uses to figure its "weighted average." It is supposed to discourage just what the libs are now doing -- stuffing the ballot box with "1's." If I am right, then once a substantial number of votes are tallied, the "1's" and the "10's" will be weighted less -- and a "9" will carry more weight.