Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drbuzzard
My referenced INCLUDED the Postal Service. This fact is reported in a footnote at the bottom of the chart.

Your reference DID NOT INCLUDE the Postal Service. That fact is stated AT THE TOP OF THE CHART.

You are not using the same numbers.

49 posted on 07/21/2011 12:45:36 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Just on a lark I decided to look up USPS employment.

from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCkQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usps.com%2Fpostalhistory%2F_pdf%2FEmployees1926to2009.pdf&rct=j&q=USPS%20total%20employment%20by%20year&ei=wpkoTp2QGIOxsAK8nqA7&usg=AFQjCNEdATFrpLtIiF8Xs7WYiawh9iAVpg&sig2=JNZNxR63wjO1p1lKUBOzEQ
(ugly isn’t it? it’s the link to download a pdf)

USPS total employment:
1964 440759
2009 623129

That’s roughly a 40% increase. So with a 58% increase in population, they have increased in productivity. Of course the increase is nothing like that of the private sector, but who’s counting. It is, however, a lot better than other civilian agencies.

Again, however, your claim that federal employment has been static since 1964 is proven to be deceptive.


53 posted on 07/21/2011 2:53:32 PM PDT by drbuzzard (different league)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson