Replies

Boris Johnson was correct, in that Breivik was a lunatic (he wasn’t just “maladjusted” - he was obviously a psychopath on the order of Charles Manson) who had just picked a convenient irritant to use for his grandiose self-justification. Hitler did the same, only Hitler was smart enough to be able to drum up supporters (also by playing on resentment against “outsiders,” in that case, the Jews) and had enough sane moments to be able to organize them. Breivik was so crazy he couldn’t even do that; maybe it was his call for men to “cut off their penises and testicles and murder innocent children” to prove their devotion to his cause that turned off any would-be followers?

In any case, while it is true that there are probably some maladjusted nuts among Islamic terrorists, nothing could account for the existence of so many of them without the existence of an underlying ideology: the violent, murderous Islam.

That said, Breivik objected only to Muslims in European societies, not to Islam itself, and in fact thought that Muslims should have all of the Middle East and build a new caliphate there.

"...maybe it was his call for men to “cut off their penises and testicles and murder innocent children” to prove their devotion to his cause that turned off any would-be followers?:

Breivik did not call for self-castration and/or execution of innocent children to prove devotion to his cause, but to prove trustworthy to a possible Islamic ally^* in his war to seize control of Europe from the Globalist Left.

In the killer's own words: "...The Islamic Ummah should view our enemies; the US/EU globalists, as a greater threat than we would ever aspire to be. The reason is that we do not wish to destroy Islam but simply to isolate it primarily outside Europe."
"Assuming we will ever seek common ground, which is unlikely at best, the problem will be the authentication process. How can the Ummah, the enemy of our enemy, know they are really dealing with a Justiciar Knight and not a CIA or EU agent? How can it be proved that the individual seeking to become a proxy for the deployment of nuclear/radiological/biological/chemical weapon(s) isn’t an undercover agent working for the US or a Western European country’s intelligence?"
"The difference between an agent and a Justiciar Knight is that the latter will be willing to make a great sacrifice for the purpose of proper validation. Now what kind of sacrifice would be great enough to remove all doubt that the candidate is not a EU/US agent? A Justiciar Knight is willing to martyr himself for the cause while a EU/US agent will not be willing to sacrifice much. The entity should demand that the alleged Justiciar Knight in question surgically remove his penis and testicles and/or execute a fixed number of civilian children."
- Manifesto, page 960 (LINK)

^*Note: A non-Globalist Islam ally that would withdrawn from Europe and limit their Caliphate expansionism to the world outside of Europe.