To: Retired Greyhound
But if she KNOWS its poison, and endorses it anyway, then she bears responsibility.
Who said it was poison to her? Didn't I say it makes me sick?
We can go back and forth all day because you SO WANT to push your 'anti SARAH' stance.
Remember - there is no talking sense to a liberal. On that note - my God-given time is valuable. I have things to do that is productive so I'll leave you to wallow around in liberalism because talking/explaining doesn't work on liberals - you just will never see it. You refuse to be accountable - you shown that over and over - it's the other person that must be accountable. Even w/my scenario - I said it makes me sick - even that you blamed on who endorsed the product. That's is base line liberalism. You sue because a 'product blew up due to the fact you pulled the wrong lever' mentality.
To: presently no screen name; Retired Greyhound
So, people who think Palin should break with the liberal RINO McCain are “liberals”, and those who think she should stay silent and stand by her endorsement of the liberal RINO are “conservatives”.
Also, something about Cheerios and eating them is thrown into the conversation.
Did I get that right?
77 posted on
07/28/2011 1:43:36 PM PDT by
Carling
(At some point, those surrounding Obama have to realize that they are working for a psychopath)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson