Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker; 10Ring; 13yearconservative; 53543freedom; 62pc62; aesop64; afraidfortherepublic; ...

Yes, we do need both attended to. We know our economy is certainly in danger with ANY major attack. There are many conserns I have, but National Security issues are top on my list.

The Wisconsis list of House members voting against our Military was really surprising to me. Looks like some Republican members followed others. Only 17 Republicans voted NO nation wide, with most from Wisconsin!

Wisconsin US House Members Who Voted Against Our Military.

Baldwin, Tammy D - 202-225-2906
Moore, Gwen D - 202-225-4572

Ryan, Paul REPUBLICAN 202-225-3031
Sensenbrenner, F. James REPUBLICAN - 202-225-5101
Petri, Thomas REPUBLICAN - 202-225-2476
Duffy, Sean P. REPUBLICAN 202-225-3365


46 posted on 07/30/2011 6:13:18 AM PDT by seekthetruth (Florida and the Nation needs Colonel Mike McCalister in the US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: seekthetruth

I wasn’t familiar with this amendment until you posted it—thanks.

My immediate thought, however, is that though this should of course be the norm, it really ought to be enforced through the military itself, rather than by the force of law. I can imagine certain highly sensitive operations where special ops forces, for example, must put themselves at risk in a fashion that this law might override.

Good intentions, but like most common sense put into law, it’s that 3% that over-legislating really mucks up.


47 posted on 07/30/2011 6:39:10 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson